Comment on Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes

• Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?

  source

  • snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Under what law?

    [Take it down act](On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deepfakes), in certain circumstances.)

    source

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?

      I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation

      source

      • snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        you will have to directly regulate image generation

        Its already being done to help prevent fake CSAM.

        That should have been standard from the start.

        source
      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I don’t think anyone has any delusions that Twitter is private, not even DM’s.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?

      source

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Definitely not convicted. That’d be some crazy speed.

        However, your insistence that it hasn’t happened yet so can’t happen is insane. There has to be a first case in which it hadn’t happened before.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here

    source

    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn’t matter if it’s satire or not, it’s still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.

      source
  • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.

    Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US

    But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement

    source