Comment on Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes

• 51dusty@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  how can an ai bot pull a free speech defense? free speech is, ostensibly, reserved for people…?

  source

  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Are you under the impression that the AI bot was not created by people?

    source

    • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      So? The manufacturer of the product is not responsible for how people use the product. Otherwise there would be no gun manufacturers anymore.

      source

      • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Not really sure what you’re trying to say here but it sounds like you’re agreeing with me.

        source
• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I disagree here, but I’m not a lawyer

  source

  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?

    source

    • snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Under what law?

      [Take it down act](On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deepfakes), in certain circumstances.)

      source

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?

        I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here

      source

      • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn’t matter if it’s satire or not, it’s still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.

      Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US

      But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement

      source