I can agree on that, but those are things that can be mentioned as running in the family.
Medical history would be pretty important.
Killer57@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Medical history would be pretty important.
I can agree on that, but those are things that can be mentioned as running in the family.
Taleya@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
Tbh i was fucking 40 before my mother casually mentioned haematomachrosis "ran in the family’ and there’s plenty of disconnected ignorant or straight up deluded people out there. Not really a strong argument.
jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Argument by bucket of crabs
Taleya@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
i don’t understand this comment
jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_mentality
Fleur_@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
Right but if a doctor asked you to check with your biological mother you would know who to go to and be able to get accurate information.
Taleya@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
uh, no
1 - Doctors don’t do that. they may ask “Any history of X in your family?” but it’s not a supercritical diagnosis factor, they can easily work without it.
2 - a number of people - myself included - have no contact with their biological parents despite being raised by them. Quite the opposite, ironically. There are also a number of people who have lost their parents / family over the years
3 - your parents are not accurate information sources.
Fleur_@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
Right so a doctor would say “any history of x” and you could ask and get an honest answer.
Sure, only being able to reply “I don’t know” isn’t helpful. But it’s far better than telling the doctor false information that you believe to be true because you are under the impression that you know who your biological parents are
That’s exactly why adopted children should be required to know they are adopted.