Comment

Comment on Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviews

Mondez@lemdro.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

I don’t see this as rotten behaviour at all, I see it as a Bobby tables moment teaching an organisation relying on a technology that they better have a their ducks in a row.

source

Sort:hotnew top

meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
It’s still extremely shitty unethical behavior in my book since the negative impact is not felt by the organization that’s failing to validate their inputs, but your peers who are potentially being screwed out of a review process and a spot in journal or conference

source
Treczoks@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Absolutely. If they don’t care to actually read the texts, they have to accept the risks of not reading it.

source
Lemminary@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Por qué no los dos?

source
- Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  It’s an XKCD comic.
  
  source
  - XeroxCool@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    They didn’t ask what the comic was, they asked “but why not both?”. It can be both unethical and a lesson
    
    source