Comment on Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviews
meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Caveat: not all of academia seems to be that rotten. The evidence found on arxiv.org is mainly, if not only, in the field of AI research itself 🤡
You can try it yourself, just type the following in googles search box:
allintext: “IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS” site:arxiv.org
A little preview:
Mondez@lemdro.id 3 weeks ago
I don’t see this as rotten behaviour at all, I see it as a Bobby tables moment teaching an organisation relying on a technology that they better have a their ducks in a row.
meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
It’s still extremely shitty unethical behavior in my book since the negative impact is not felt by the organization that’s failing to validate their inputs, but your peers who are potentially being screwed out of a review process and a spot in journal or conference
Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Absolutely. If they don’t care to actually read the texts, they have to accept the risks of not reading it.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Por qué no los dos?
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
It’s an XKCD comic.
XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They didn’t ask what the comic was, they asked “but why not both?”. It can be both unethical and a lesson