Comment on AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoOk what about tech journalists who produced articles with those misunderstandings. Surely they know better yet still produce articles like this. But also people who care enough about this topic to post these articles usually I assume know better yet still spread this crap
suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Whoa that’s like how many colors there are
TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
AI cant even understand it’s own brain to write about it
Tja@programming.dev 5 weeks ago
Neither can we…
TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
and yet we can understand 256 in ways AI cant
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 weeks ago
Check out Ed Zitron’s angry reporting on Tech journalists fawning over this garbage and reporting on it uncritically. He has a newsletter and a podcast.
Zron@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Tech journalists don’t know a damn thing. They’re people that liked computers and could also bullshit an essay in college. That doesn’t make them an expert on anything.
synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 weeks ago
… And nowadays they let the LLM help with the bullshittery
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Are you guys sure. The media seems to be where a lot of LLM hate originates.
TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
that is such a ridiculous idea. Just because you see hate for it in the media doesn’t mean it originated there. I’ll have you know that i have embarrassed myself by screaming at robot phone receptionists for years now. stupid fuckers pretending to be people but not knowing shit. I was born ready to hate LLMs and I’m not gonna have you claim that CNN made me do it.
synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 weeks ago
Whatever gets ad views