You know, and I think it’s actually the opposite. Anyone pretending their brain is doing more than pattern recognition and AI can therefore not be “intelligence” is a fucking idiot.
Comment on We need to stop pretending AI is intelligent
guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Anyone pretending AI has intelligence is a fucking idiot.
amelia@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Clearly intelligent people mispell and have horrible grammar too.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
I think there’s a strong strain of essentialist human chauvinism.
But it’s more kinds of thing than LLM’s are doing. Except in the case of llmbros.
Auli@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
No your failing the Eliza test and it is very easy for people to fall for it.
PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You could say they’re AS (Actual Stupidity)
Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Autonomous Systems that are Actual Stupid lol
JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
Caveat: Anyone who has been scrutinising ‘AI’.
Something i often forget is the vast majority of the population doesnt care about technology, privacy, the mechanics of LLMs as much as i do and I pay attention to.
So most people read/hear/watch stories of how great it is and how clever AI can do simple things for them so its easy to see how they think its doing a lot more ‘thought’ logic work than it really is, other than realistically it being a glorified word predictor.
MangoCats@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
AI is not actual intelligence. However, it can produce results better than a significant number of professionally employed people…
I am reminded of when word processors came out and “administrative assistant” dwindled as a role in mid-level professional organizations, most people - even increasingly medical doctors these days - do their own typing. The whole “typing pool” concept has pretty well dried up.
tartarin@reddthat.com 3 weeks ago
However, there is a huge energy cost for that speed to process statistically the information to mimic intelligence. The human brain is consuming much less energy. Also, AI will be fine with well defined task where innovation isn’t a requirement. As it is today, AI is incapable to innovate.
cheesorist@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
much less? I’m pretty sure our brains need food and food requires lots of other stuff that need transportation or energy themselves to produce.
Potatar@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Customarily, when doing these kind of calculations we ignore stuff which keep us alive because these things are needed regardless of economic contributions, since you know people are people and not tools.
tartarin@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
Your brain is running on sugar. Do you take into account the energy spent in coal mining, oil fields exploration, refinery, transportation, electricity transmission loss when computing the amount of energy required to build and run AI? Do you take into account all the energy consumption for the knowledge production in first place to train your model? Running the brain alone is much less energy intensive than running an AI model. And the brain can create actual new content/knowledge. There is nothing like the brain. AI excel at processing large amount of data, which the brain is not made for.
Auli@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
And we “need” none of that to live. We just choose to use it.
MangoCats@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
Yes, but when you fully load the human brain’s energy costs with 20 years of schooling, 20 years of “retirement” and old-age care, vacation, sleep, personal time, housing, transportation, etc. etc. - it adds up.
burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
you can give me a sandwige and ill do a better job than AI
MangoCats@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
But, will you do it 24-7-365?
burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
i dont have anything else going on, man