Izzy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The supreme court doesn’t decide the president of the unite states so probably nothing would happen.
jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 year ago
Izzy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Your link doesn’t lead to anything, but if you are trying to suggest the supreme arbitrarily decided Bush won the presidency then that is factually incorrect. There was a court case about Florida’s ballots in particular that happened to be enough to decide the outcome of the presidential election.
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
The Supreme Court decided the election.
jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 year ago
More to the point, they stopped the recount.
OptimusPhillip@lemmy.world 1 year ago
But they didn’t decide it directly and arbitrarily, as OP is suggesting might have happened. The power to elect the President is in the hands of the Electoral College, and the House of Representatives. The most that a Supreme Court can do is tamper with the process of tallying the popular vote.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Wait didn’t they decide it with Bush vs Gore? I read that Clarence was the deciding vote for why Bush was declared the winner even though he lost.
Sylver@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The Supreme Court decided on whether or not to recount in Florida. They didn’t directly choose the winning candidate
ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
I mean, that part played out anyway…
redballooon@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Only for the half of the people that previously thought the Supreme Court to think along their thoughts.