analysing network traffic wouldn’t allow an adversary to see what you’re sending with Signal
How are they analyzing network traffic with Signal? It’s encrypted. And why does it matter if they know you’re sending a message? Literally everyone using Signal is sending a message.
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
[deleted]Ulrich@feddit.org 10 months ago
It isn’t.
Diurnambule@jlai.lu 10 months ago
laquadrature.net/…/criminalization-of-encryption-…
For France, Your a terroriste if you use signal
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Then you’re a terrorist if you use the internet, period
Nearly all internet traffic if encrypted, and for plain browser traffic it’s probably in the 95+%
You access your bank? Terrorist! Email? Terrorist! Lemmy? Terrorist!
Ulrich@feddit.org 10 months ago
Then you’re also a terrorist if you use The Guardian 🤷♂️
eronth@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It’s a red flag to those who think you’re going to share internal info.
Ulrich@feddit.org 10 months ago
Or it’s just a perfectly normal thing that billions of people do every day?
Natanael@infosec.pub 10 months ago
Timing of messages. They can’t tell what you send, but can tell when
Ulrich@feddit.org 10 months ago
No they can’t.
papertowels@mander.xyz 10 months ago
papertowels@mander.xyz 10 months ago
Again, not my specialty, but signals end to end encryption is akin to sealing a letter. Nobody but the sender and the recipient can open that letter.
But you still gotta send it through the mail. That’s the network traffic analysis that can be used.
Here’s an example of why that could be bad.