I saw the headline and was ready to rage about why they should just use signal instead. Then I read the article and honestly this is a fucking genius use of tech
The Guardian and the University of Cambridge Computer Science Department unveil new technology to protect journalists
Submitted 17 hours ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
Ulrich@feddit.org 10 hours ago
I read it and don’t understand. Why is this better than Signal?
Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
For one, ease of access. Say you’re trying to break a story, who are you going to message with signal? Because you’re going to need to get that contact info somehow right?
Snowden is permanently stranded in Russia. That’s not exactly a great example of an anonymous source.
rosco385@lemmy.wtf 9 hours ago
Because analysing network traffic wouldn’t allow an adversary to see what you’re sending with Signal, but they could still tell you’re sendig a secure message.
What the Guardian is doing is hiding that secure chat traffic inside the Guardian app, so packet sniffing would only show you’re accessing news.
MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 6 hours ago
Messaging protocols already resemble the frameworks that come out from time to time. And their effectiveness is due to the fact that they require a certain quota of users.
It’s just a secure messaging app with a direct line to Guardian journalists. How to use 911 or special numbers when you’re not feeling well.
hera@feddit.uk 16 hours ago
Love seeing open source projects from companies that aren’t specifically tech firms
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 16 hours ago
Horrible name sadly
fubarx@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Image