as long as you own the game, emulation is legal.
People say this, but I believe it is mostly technically untrue. It’d be a relatively easy argument to say that a downloaded ROM that isn’t exactly the digital copy YOU purchased with a license would be seen as not legal.
However some people talk about literally ripping the game off the physical device themselves, hence copying their own copy of it. Now you are in grey territory of making copies of copyrighted materials, and in the case of more modern games like the last decade, they almost assuredly have language that specifies you don’t actually own the code and all that.
All I’m saying is be careful and probably refrain from repeating the fallacy that owning a game makes emulation of it legal, because that implies having the ROM is legal and that’s doubtful.
glitchdx@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Nintendo was able to sue palworld using a patent that didn’t exist before palworlds release. It’s not right, but they can do whatever they want regardless of what the law says.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
They were able to do that because Palworld is made by Japanese devs, and they used specifically Japanese patent law. Doesn’t apply here.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Exhibit number 4,923,768 for why patents should not exist and need to be aggressively banished from civilization.
entwine413@lemm.ee 20 hours ago
That’s not the lawsuit that’s being discussed. It’s the Yuzu Switch emulator lawsuit.
glitchdx@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
yeah, i know. Point is that Nintendo can do whatever they want with the flimsyest excuse.
pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 hours ago
Exactly. They can file a lawsuit even knowing they might not win just to burden someone into crippling debt if they want to defend themselves