Hosting and storage costs, few can afford to be an alternative to a absolutely gigantic video storage platform that costs obscene money to maintain.
Comment on YouTube rolls out more unskippable ads that make viewers wait even longer to watch videos - Dexerto
atlien51@lemm.ee 1 day ago
WHY DONT WE HAVE A MAINSTREAM ALTERNATIVE YET
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 day ago
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 hours ago
I am causing a netloss to googs. I don’t pay for Google plus or whatever, and j don’t view their fucking ads. Win win if you ask me.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 14 hours ago
It was fun to thumb my nose at Google while it lasted I guess, maybe if they were less amoral then I’d be less belligerent toward them.
Tregetour@lemdro.id 17 hours ago
People get proccupied with emulating YT, which is indeed cost prohibitive. But that response assumes one is emulting all of it. What about only pursuing sections of it to cater to particular audiences? Serving 100% of YT’s video might be too much for Amazon (for example) but what about 1%?
Why couldn’t Amazon host Booktube? And the manga/anime enthusiasts and other varietes of weebs to go along with them? They already own ebook retail. A VOD service to chip off some of YT’s viewership would be a more productive investment than The Rings of Power…
howrar@lemmy.ca 11 hours ago
I believe the main cost is in hosting all the videos. A lot of them are probably junk that were never meant to see the light of day. I certainly use it as an extra backup for many of my videos with no context and random UUID titles.
For everything else, a potential solution is to have everyone come in with their own videos hosted elsewhere and the platform just integrated with a bunch of APIs for fetching and serving those videos. For small time creators, the cost should be fairly low to none since a lot of platforms allow you to store a small number of files for free.
airportline@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
We do, but you probably don’t like it (TikTok).
atlien51@lemm.ee 1 day ago
You’re right :)
I meant idk something like Oddysse (but a website with actual moderation)
ewenak@jlai.lu 1 day ago
Do you know of PeerTube? It’s not mainstream at all either, but it seems more known to me.
It’s also in the fediverse, and isn’t accused of the same moderation issues (though idk if PeerTube is really better than Odyssee at moderation, I suppose it’s just a difference in policy).
GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
OK, so a bittorrent tracker site with a video player built in with comments underneath and you can get perks from content creators for seeding. Then of course some kind of voting system and etc. Then a creator can just get a seed box to start hosting their own videos.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 hours ago
It’s a very difficult business model to make profitable without an already massive userbase.
atlien51@lemm.ee 13 hours ago
Yes but not everything needs to make a profit, just not make a loss. Also it could be community supported with donations and stuff:)
amorangi@lemmy.nz 1 day ago
By operating youtube at a loss for many years Google acted anticompetitively to kill competition or stop competition arising. Now that they’ve achieved that they can do what they like. Don’t feel bad using ad blockers against this anti-capitalist company.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Final stage of enshittification, now they are allowing more right wing propaganda than normal on the channel
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 day ago
And suppression of comments, for all sorts of reasons. Words and phrases will constantly flag AI autoremoval.
anas@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I am in no way defending YouTube here, but how did it act anticompetitively?
Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 day ago
FYI, this is currently happening with Uber.
atlien51@lemm.ee 20 hours ago
I never felt bad abt that for a second. Like the thought never crossed my kind XD FUCK YOUTUBE!