Comment on YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content. Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"

lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• gndagreborn@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Content speak continously erodes my frontal lobe.

  source
• shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I’m going to start using “inhumed”.

  source
• Vespair@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  People have literally never had to say that.

  First off it was Tiktok, not YouTube, that started the “unalived” trend, but even then make no mistake, “killed,” “murdered,” “died,” etc has never been banned on tiktok either.

  What has been happening is that videos (on tiktok) with “potentially divisive content” are not being promoted by tiktok. You video will not get removed just for saying the word “killed” and will still be fully available for viewing by your followers, it just won’t be promoted on the For You page for strangers.

  And it’s fine if you still object to this, but we have to stop conflating the two. Not being promoting is not the same thing as being censored.

  source

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Maybe you’re right: is there verification?

    Neither content policy (youtube or tiktok) clearly lays out rules on those words. I only find unverified claims: some write it started at YouTube, others claim TikTok. They claim YouTube demonetizes & TikTok shadowbans. They generally agree content restrictions by these platforms led to the propagation of circumspect shit like unalive & SA.

    TikTok policy outlines their moderation methods, which include removal and ineligibility to the for you feed. Given their policy on self-harm & automated removal of potential violations, their policy is to effectively & recklessly censor such language.

    Generally, censorship is suppression of expression. Censorship doesn’t exclusively mean content removal, though they’re doing that, too. (Digression: revisionism & whitewashing are forms of censorship.)

    Regardless of how they censor or induce self-censorship, they’re chilling inoffensive language pointlessly. While as private entities they are free to moderate as they please, it’s unnecessary & the effect is an obnoxious affront on self-expression that’s contorting language for the sake of avoid idiotic restrictions.

    source
• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Yes but that’s not really a problem like the overwhelming fascism.

  source