Well mr anti-purity test, maybe these people you dont like have non-negotaibles – like being against genocide. Things they wont negotiate away which you dont understand it because theres nothing you wouldnt sell out.
AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 10 months ago
I’ll give you a huge one.
Purity tests (when cosplaying as liberals). If a person isn’t super-duper liberal on every single issue then you can’t support them.
There’s tons of this on this very site. People who will tell you they’ll stay home and not vote for someone, if they only support 80% of what they seemingly want. People see this, then emulate said behavior.
Somehow, liberals would rather get 0% of what they want instead of 50% because of the missed 30% that the candidate doesn’t support.
kreskin@lemmy.world 10 months ago
WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
genocide is not something you negotiate away.
Genocide is not something you stay at home for and hope it goes away on its own.
You don’t get to claim the ally if all you did was nothing.
OP criticized people who stayed home (choosing to hold on to their purity) instead of voting for the candidates least likely to perpetuate futher suffering.
Going “oh no this trolley problem is so terrible I refuse to even look at the lever” is prioritizing your own moral superiority over the people tied to the trolley.
InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Further
genocide is not something you negotiate away.
And such imply that we are voting to start one or not. That’s not on the ballot. The war has already started and we are asking people to vote for the side that cares more about ending it.
It really shows how privileged we are that we take a luxury of picking allies.
Even if someone is taking the position of total Palestine Victory the dems are the better pick as they most likely lead to being ableyto fight another day.
People who didn’t vote because the dems aren’t perfect are the worst allies.
Do Not Wait To Strike Till the Iron Is Hot; But Make It Hot By Striking
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
People who didn’t vote because the dems aren’t perfect
It’s hard to take seriously people who describe “actively committing genocide” as “not perfect”
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 months ago
I agree 100% with the purity test thing, but “liberal” ≠ leftist. That’s not a purity thing, it’s a “words have specific definitions” thing.
I know idiot tankies say this, and I know they are annoying when they constantly use “liberal” as an insult… But it is technically correct that they are two distinct ideologies.
AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 10 months ago
Sure. My point stands. A leftist will get 30-50% of what they want with a Democrat in office compared to 0% of what they want.
A toddler can work out it’s better that you get a small portion of what you want, instead of nothing. It’s really that simple.
InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Do Not Wait To Strike Till the Iron Is Hot; But Make It Hot By Striking
People who abstain from voting dem need to read that.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
If committing genocide is bipartisan policy for the US, then what I want as a leftist is for the US to collapse.
rumba@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
the US to collapse.
You act like that’ll improve the genocide situation. We’re in the middle of a collapse and the new godking is ALL OVER more genocide.
The US will change hands, but it won’t be to the people…
ConstantPain@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Politicians you don’t like can make good policies and politicians you do like can make bad policies. Parties are not football teams for you to take blind sides and politicians are not celebrities to be veneered blindly. They are public servants, nothing more.
It’s a global phenomenon, but Americans are particularly affect by the false dichotomy fallacy of having the two sides of political spectrum represented when, in reality, they just have two flavors of right to choose from. Both are shit in their own way.
People love to turn off their brains and follow the leadership. That’s what makes us easily manipulable. It’s not because someone aligns politically with you that they are working with your best interest in mind.
Sorry for the random rambling.
AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 10 months ago
Yeah, and you’d think that even leftists would agree that having the people in charge that want cheaper college, and cheaper medicine/healthcare would be the better option, even if (from their lens) they are a right wing party.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Not if it means exterminating whole races overseas
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
The 30% is active genocide
AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 10 months ago
Dude, you guys don’t give a shit that Myanmar is in a civil war, Sudan is in a civil war, China is ethnically cleansing Uighur Muslims, and that India and Pakistan are in almost-open conflict.
You put the fact that a trump ally in Israel wouldn’t listen to Democrats solely on the shoulders of Biden and Harris while completely not giving a singular fuck about any of those other conflicts.
This is why people like you are the PERFECT definition of slactivists, who are looking for a reason to not get a portion of what you want so you can feel morally superior to others for not participating in democracy.
Get over yourself.
andybytes@programming.dev 10 months ago
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Dude, you guys don’t give a shit that Myanmar is in a civil war, Sudan is in a civil war, China is ethnically cleansing Uighur Muslims, and that India and Pakistan are in almost-open conflict.
Whataboutism.
Israel wouldn’t listen to Democrats
No. Democratic loyalists are hellbent on rewriting history to erase the truth, and to cover up the fact that the Democratic party were and are active supporters and participants in the Gaza genocide, and that is at least as dangerous as anything MAGA is doing.
This is why people like you are the PERFECT definition of slactivists, who are looking for a reason to not get a portion of what you want so you can feel morally superior to others for not participating in democracy.
This is a completely insane way to describe opposition to genocide.
Get over yourself
Stop supporting genocide
SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
Hey look, we have a live one!
MrShankles@reddthat.com 10 months ago
It’s still happening though
SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 10 months ago
Oh look we got a live one!
Mods: if you’re going to remove comments, at least have the guts to say you want to maintain your echo chamber instead of hiding behind rule 5, which this comment does not violate.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Speaking of bad faith techniques: screaming “Oh look we got a live one!” at anyone who disagrees with you.
Nyonnyan@lemmy.world 10 months ago
[deleted]BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
My opinion is that doesn’t make opposition to genocide “purity testing”
MBech@feddit.dk 10 months ago
The problem is, the other option is 70% genocide. So by not voting for the 30% genocide, you’re enabling the 70% genocide.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
No, I mean the 30% of their policy that we disagree with is there 100% support for genocide.
MBech@feddit.dk 10 months ago
And the republicans have 70% of their policy be genocide. Not just genocide of the palestinians, but genocide of non-gender conforming people and non-straight people.
It’s like comparing someone who doesn’t care that someone in another country is killing people, with someone who actively wants to kill people in your own back yard, and also doesn’t give a shit that someone is killing people in another country. By not voting for the first person, you’re allowing the second person do to whatever they want.
SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 10 months ago
We got a live one!
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Speaking of bad faith techniques: screaming “we got a live one!” At people you disagree with.
sudoer777@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
If the 20% they don’t support is the absolute most basic of human rights, then as far as I can tell they support 0% of what I want.