Comment on In a few years, new smartphones will be as big and heavy as the first cell phones.

itsathursday@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• NONE_dc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Women are not allowed to have pockets, is in the Bible (I guess idk)

  source

  • Moonweedbaddegrasse@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Why would my wife need pockets when she has 82 zillion designer handbags?

    source

    • NONE_dc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Maybe she have all that cuz she’s eager for some goddamn pockets.

      source
    • Zenith@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Can I have one of her designer handbags? I’m over here with these sewn shut pockets

      source

      • Moonweedbaddegrasse@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I’d happily let you have them all :)

        source
  • lordnikon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    We need to bring back Jnco jeans back for both men and women. Pockets galore. Also www.pocketsforwomen.co.uk

    source

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      They still make them. You can just buy jncos right now. Jnco.com. they’re just still stupid expensive.

      source

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Cool yeah i mean bring them back in fashion to wear.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • cattywampas@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Straight leg and baggy jeans with big pockets are plenty available for women.

    source

    • NONE_dc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      None of those words are in the bible.

      source
• pishadoot@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The clothing industry doesn’t make many clothes with pockets for women because they don’t sell. Women all complain that they don’t get pockets, but then vote with their wallets.

  This is a legit example of the intended meaning of the phrase “the customer is always right.” The market supplies what customers demand, and for all the fist shaking about having nowhere to put a phone, there’s very little actual market demand for women’s clothing with pockets. Majority of demand is related to outdoor activities so you see them there.

  source

  • tyler@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That just isn’t true. Answers in Progress on YouTube does a good video on the history of pockets in women’s clothes.

    source

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      “I saw it on YouTube and therefore it must be true, not basic economics”

      source

      • tyler@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        You’re right, it is basic economics. Just not in the way stated. Adding pockets costs money. Women’s clothes are often created incredibly cheaply. It has nothing to do with women not wanting pockets.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • cattywampas@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It is true. Women’s pants with big pockets are freely available, just do a Google shopping search and you’ll see. American Eagle, Gap, Abercrombie, Forever 21, Old Navy, H&M, Ann Taylor, Dickies, Patagonia, Levi’s, and the list goes on. All these retailers sell baggy and loose pants with big pockets.

      Also worth noting, Y2K fashion is very in with younger people and you’ll see them wearing a lot of baggy pants, I’m talking JNCO baggy.

      So why aren’t big-pocketed pants the standard in women’s fashion? It’s simple: women tend to want slimmer pants. It’s just a consumer decision.

      source

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Some women want the slimmer pants, yet all the options with pockets are baggy. Yes you need some space for a pocket, but that doesn’t mean the entire entire pant needs to be baggy.

        Men’s slim jeans are available with pockets able to accommodate a larger phone with out issue.

        source
      • tyler@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        It’s not a consumer decision. Women’s clothes are often created very cheaply. Adding pockets costs money. Therefore cheap (see slimmer clothes) are created without pockets, even if women would wear them with pockets. Your own explanation actually agrees with that by stating it’s tied to the looseness of the pants. You can’t get the look on baggy pants without actually putting the pockets there. If they could they would.

        source

        • -> View More Comments