Andy why do we even count the fleshy fingers, when we could be counting the gaps between them?
Each finger is conveniently split into 3 parts. Using 8 fingers we can count to 24 without resorting to any fancy math.
The whole concept of even having a middle finger is a bit arbitrary. When you put your hands on a table, all 10 fingers spread out, the gap between the hands is the exact middle. If you include all 10 fingers, there is no middle finger, but there is a middle gap.
Andy why do we even count the fleshy fingers, when we could be counting the gaps between them? It’s the number of gaps that really matters when you’re holding on to a bunch of things like papers, magazines, forks, sticks, stones, strings, cables or whatever.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 day ago
spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Just go base 2 and you can count to 31 without using knuckles
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 day ago
True, although I would put binary in the “fancy math” category.
Cethin@lemmy.zip 16 hours ago
I wouldn’t. It’s easy, people just haven’t learned it. It takes probably all of a minute to teach someone to count in binary with their fingers.
roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Actually can count to 144 or a gross if you use base 12. One hand for the ones place and the other hand for the dozens.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’ve always wonder if it was worth the effort of learning base 12 mental arithmetic.
roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Depends if you’re a farmer or merchant without access to electronics.
TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
That’s the point most westerners seem to miss. There are so many ways to use fingers to count, while the one common in Europe the simplest one possible. It’s like demo version, while some other countries get the full pro ultra max edition.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 day ago
There are so many ways to use fingers to count, while the one common in Europe the simplest one possible
But this isn’t about counting on fingers. It’s about counting fingers. As in, the fingers themselves are what’s being counted when you talk about your “middle finger”.
TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Fair enough. This was an unnecessary side tangent.
BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You take one hand and count with the thumb as 1 and the pinky as 5 and the middle number is 3. If you switch and start with the pinky as 1 and the thumb as 5 the middle finger is still the middle number. Talking about the gaps can be useful but anatomically we name things for what’s there and what’s not there and we talk about fingers much more than we talk about the gaps
Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 days ago
Sure, but we don’t say you have one middle finger, we talk about the two middle fingers. As in, one per hand. It’s not the middle of all your fingers, it’s the middle of the fingers on that hand.
We don’t count the gabs because that’s…not how counting things works. When delivering a bag of apples, you don’t count how many gaps between apples there are, you count the number of apples. You have to know that your second paragraph here is a stretch that would make a Republican lawmaker seem sensible, don’t you?
Prathas@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Whoa now, hold your horses…
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Not a comparison I use lightly, I assure you.
Maybe that one politician a while back who wanted to redefine pi to equal 4 would be on this level.
Droechai@lemm.ee 21 hours ago
Why leave Pi to mathematicians rather than democratically-ish elected leaders? Pi is far to important to be left outside of democracys sphere of influence