Comment

Comment on

It’s pretty normal to count the thumb as a finger. I find it strange that you would not.

If you were asked “how many fingers do you have”, would you answer 8, or 10? Surely, everyone knows the answer is 10 (assuming no physical abnormalities)? On a fingering chart, music will instruct you to play a note with your thumb with the number “1” and your pinky with the number “5”.

source

Sort:hotnew top

kautau@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Image

source
TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
The whole concept of even having a middle finger is a bit arbitrary. When you put your hands on a table, all 10 fingers spread out, the gap between the hands is the exact middle. If you include all 10 fingers, there is no middle finger, but there is a middle gap.

Andy why do we even count the fleshy fingers, when we could be counting the gaps between them? It’s the number of gaps that really matters when you’re holding on to a bunch of things like papers, magazines, forks, sticks, stones, strings, cables or whatever.

source
- Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Sure, but we don’t say you have one middle finger, we talk about the two middle fingers. As in, one per hand. It’s not the middle of all your fingers, it’s the middle of the fingers on that hand.
  
  We don’t count the gabs because that’s…not how counting things works. When delivering a bag of apples, you don’t count how many gaps between apples there are, you count the number of apples. You have to know that your second paragraph here is a stretch that would make a Republican lawmaker seem sensible, don’t you?
  
  source
  - Prathas@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    
    make a Republican lawmaker seem sensible
    
    Whoa now, hold your horses…
    
    source
    Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Not a comparison I use lightly, I assure you.
    
    Maybe that one politician a while back who wanted to redefine pi to equal 4 would be on this level.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  
  Andy why do we even count the fleshy fingers, when we could be counting the gaps between them?
  
  Each finger is conveniently split into 3 parts. Using 8 fingers we can count to 24 without resorting to any fancy math.
  
  source
  - spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    Just go base 2 and you can count to 31 without using knuckles
    
    source
    Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    True, although I would put binary in the “fancy math” category.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - roguetrick@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    Actually can count to 144 or a gross if you use base 12. One hand for the ones place and the other hand for the dozens.
    
    source
    Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I’ve always wonder if it was worth the effort of learning base 12 mental arithmetic.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    That’s the point most westerners seem to miss. There are so many ways to use fingers to count, while the one common in Europe the simplest one possible. It’s like demo version, while some other countries get the full pro ultra max edition.
    
    source
    Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    
    There are so many ways to use fingers to count, while the one common in Europe the simplest one possible
    
    But this isn’t about counting on fingers. It’s about counting fingers. As in, the fingers themselves are what’s being counted when you talk about your “middle finger”.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- BussyCat@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  You take one hand and count with the thumb as 1 and the pinky as 5 and the middle number is 3. If you switch and start with the pinky as 1 and the thumb as 5 the middle finger is still the middle number. Talking about the gaps can be useful but anatomically we name things for what’s there and what’s not there and we talk about fingers much more than we talk about the gaps
  
  source