You can remove YouTube videos from your watch history, so they don’t influence your algorithm.
ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
I admit I didn’t watch the video — I’ve trained YouTube’s algorithm well at this point and don’t want Tesla content — but what the fuck is a predictive odometer? The tires roll a certain distance. We’ve had odometers for like 75 years.
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
AugustWest@lemm.ee 51 minutes ago
Or don’t use YouTube on their platform.
gamer@lemm.ee 36 minutes ago
FreeTube, Grayjay, etc are better experiences by far
50MYT@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
The video shows it going like 14999 to 15001 skipping 15000.
pHr34kY@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
You’d think they would make it increment every half mile instead of doing something stupid like this.
itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
Yeah if you’re gonna do a fraud at least put the minimum thought into it. It’s disrespectful is what it is. Gives honest grifters a bad name
Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
My odometer on my 2012 Honda increments every TENTH of a mile. As do most older cars…
bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 hours ago
“shit i always do that i always mess up some mundane detail” ~ Tesla Engineers probably
xthexder@l.sw0.com 11 hours ago
Except in this case they’re defrauding customers instead of corporate like in Office Space…
ogeist@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
The article mentions that Tesla is kind of justifying the behavior by saying it is based on energy consumption and some other bullshit. The expectation according to SAE, which I find very interesting, is to be in a range of +/- 4% and for GPS enabled odometers+/- 2.5%, Tesla is missing the mark for at least 36%.
SavageCreation@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
So we traded a proven, reliable, physical laws based method (wheel roll) in favor of unreliable electronics. Nice.
Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
Electronics can be extremely reliable, but Tesla chose to be sleezebags.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
You’ve summed up every aspect of the Tesla. Especially now that real car companies are taking EVs seriously.
cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
Reinventing the wheel.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
That makes your warranty expire faster. It’s not in the users favor.
Michal@programming.dev 8 hours ago
It’s not really that reliable as it it will depend on the diameter of the wheels that can vary with pressure, wear, and and actual tyre size.
A better method may be a sensor like the one used in optical mice.
AugustWest@lemm.ee 48 minutes ago
I have test all three methods. GPS is the best, but it has drop outs. You can add an inertial gyro system to compensate, but that becomes sloppy the longer it goes without GPS.
The tire method has a lot of variances, but the measure at the transmission is often worse.
wewbull@feddit.uk 5 hours ago
…but what are we actually trying to measure here? The miles travelled, or the wear and tear that’s caused by the wheels spinning?
SavageCreation@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Fair, and thinking about it it doesn’t account for unnecessary wheelspin
Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
I think that pretty much sums up the entire ethos of Silicon Valley these days.
SavageCreation@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
DISRUPT THE MARKETTTTTTT