Sideloading doesn’t sound dangerous, if anything it sounds cool lol
Comment on Unofficial TikTok downloads surge in the US
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Sideloading isn’t an actual thing. It’s a word the industry made up to make installing your own software sound dangerous.
All traditional Windows applications were “sideloaded” and back then it was just fucking called installing an application.
Prior to the bullshit ass Microsoft Store, side-loading was literally the only way to get shit on Windows.
Linux also always allowed you to install applications directly. Everyone just uses package management software at this point because it’s all well managed and easier to keep things updated, but you can still install things manually with make.
cm0002@lemmy.world 1 week ago
errer@lemmy.world 1 week ago
It sounds cool because it sounds dangerous
Tiefa@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Hell yeah. Lemme put on my hacker glasses and sideload some shit.
funkajunk@lemm.ee 1 week ago
I guess you’ve convinced me to sideload and smoke cigarettes.
I’m going to be so fucking cool.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 week ago
It’s a word the industry made up to make installing your own software sound dangerous.
[citation needed]
jasep@lemmy.world 1 week ago
The term “sideloading” has been around since the 90s. Source: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sideloading
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 week ago
The term “sideload” was coined in the late 1990s by online storage service i-drive as an alternative means of transferring and storing computer files virtually instead of physically.
Sounds like it was something very different back then…
merde@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
ulrich!
now you are lars ulrich. How many ulrichs can you be?
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 week ago
Oh merde! You caught me!
T156@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Linux also always allowed you to install applications directly. Everyone just uses package management software at this point because it’s all well managed and easier to keep things updated, but you can still install things manually with make.
You only need make if you’re compiling. Installating precompiled software is somewhat easier, since it’s basically just copying to /bin. If you know where that is, then it’s simple.
privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
make install typically also handles copying things like libraries, shared assets, and docs as needed, but yeah precompiled software is usually a tar… or loading a downloaded package file into the package manager.
PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 1 week ago
There’s even .deb, .rpm, flakes, whatever pacman uses, … that are just package files that copy to /bin/ for you, like .apk/.ipas.
lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Whew…
Lotta words for a semantics quibble that amounts to a distinction without a difference… 🤷♂️
njordomir@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I also felt like the author of the article ignorantly weaponized the name to make something completely mundane sound like a bad thing. They totally stomped right into the corporate moustrap while doing so. Why not call all app stores something like “corporate single source installation” or “[Microsoft/google/apple] assisted installation”? Maybe someone will write an article on the dangers of that.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 week ago
As a traditional Mac user I also “side loaded” applications
IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 week ago
As a recent modern Mac user, this experience is so bizarre and is always a little different.
I grew up on macs (thanks mom) and built a PC as soon as I had my first real job in highschool. I recently bought a MacBook for the promise of battery life and cool running. If only it was easier to get my arm windows laptop to boot Linux…
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Back in the 80s and 90s it was a lot like installing software on Windows except you’d drag the application to where you wanted it instead of doing
a:\setup.exe