Executives think they are the most important part of the company. They are high level managers, that is all.
Comment on Tech's Dumbest Mistake: Why Firing Programmers for AI Will Destroy Everything
JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
It’s hard for people who haven’t experienced the loss of experts to understand. Not a programmer but I worked in aerospace engineering for 35 years. The drive to transfer value to execs and other stakeholders by reducing the cost of those who literally make that value always ends costing more.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 week ago
shalafi@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’d argue the CEO is the most important person, usually. We see dipshits like Musk and turn around and bag on all of them.
Think of a business, doesn’t matter if it’s local or national. How do the employees act? Are they happy and seem to be doing useful work? Are they downcast and depressed looking?
Sometimes it’s the local manager staving off corporate bullshit, but company culture mostly rolls down from the CEO. They saying, “Shit rolls downhill.”, works both ways.
QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 6 days ago
The CEO and C Suite are the least important people in a company. They can be changed out with relatively little interruption and it takes a lot longer to see the effects. However, you have a on the ground workforce stop producing and the effects are immediate and long lasting.
conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Well, yeah, but those costs are for tomorrow’s executive to figure out, we need those profits NOW
splinter@lemm.ee 1 week ago
It’s utterly bizarre. The customers lose out by receiving an inferior product at the same cost. The workers lose out by having their employment terminated. And even the company loses out by having its reputation squandered. The only people who gain are the executives and the ownership.
JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 1 week ago
This is absolutely by design. The corporate raider playbook is well-read. See: Sears, Fluke, DeWalt, Boeing, HP, Intel, Anker, any company purchased by Vista (RIP Smartsheet, we barely knew ye), and so on. Find a brand with an excellent reputation, gut it, strip mine that goodwill, abandon the husk on a golden parachute, and make sure to not be the one holding the bag.
Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
What happened to ankor?
heavydust@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
On a more generic scale (whatever that means), we went from coding serious stuff in Ada with contracts and designs and architectures, to throwing everything in the trash while forgetting any kind of pride and responsibility in less than 50 years. AI is the next step in that global engineering enshittification (I hate that word but it’s appropriate).
sudo42@lemmy.world 1 week ago
<cough>Boeing<cough>
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Everyone. But Boeing did a pretty fucked up job of it.
reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
those executives act like parasites. They bring no value and just leech the life from the companies.
ICastFist@programming.dev 1 week ago
WE MAED TEH PROFITZ!!!1!!1
reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
which is ironical since without them the profits would likely soar. Doing bad shit 101 is to pin the consequences of your actions on others and falsely claim any benefits others have managed to do as your own achievements.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
IMO without execs, employees would get paid for a greater percentage of their labor and profits would go down.