I thought it didn’t sound any different to me too. That is until me and a friend were riding around listening to Icky Thump by The White Stripes for a few weeks when it first came out.
Higher bitrate, ripped directly from the CD, pretty decent car radio.
We had been listening to my copy, he didn’t own yet.
We stopped at a record store one day when we were out and he picked up his copy. He wanted to play the CD for whatever reason, and when he stuck the disc in, “berderwiddledod dahta dah BOOM BOOM BOOM”.
I couldn’t believe it. It was like the record just sucked the power out of us both and used it to burst through the speakers.
The mp3, by comparison, sounded shrunk down from the source and splashed with water.
It didn’t change my listening habits because of convenience, but damn. It was an eye opener.
DavidDoesLemmy@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
Opus is better in every way
kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Except ubiquitousness.
I can play an MP3 on any digital audio device made in the last 20 years.
DavidDoesLemmy@lemmynsfw.com 1 day ago
True. All my devices support it, but many older ones may not.
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Ubiquitousness is not an aspect of the codec, let alone a technical one. It’s yet another failure of capitalism.
shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
I use a combination of mp3s and opus primarily but I can’t remember if opus is the open format ogg or not.
heavydust@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
I don’t know all the details but Ogg is dead, and Opus has all the advantages from low quality (Speex) to high quality (better than Ogg). It’s made by the same guys anyway. And starting at 128 kbps approximatively, it’s “near perfect” quality which means your ears won’t detect the difference with FLAC. So: as small as MP3, as good as FLAC. I love that stuff.
Scrollone@feddit.it 2 days ago
And what’s the extension of opus? .opus?
DavidDoesLemmy@lemmynsfw.com 1 day ago
I personally can’t hear any difference with 96kbps Opus.