SkyNet.
Comment on OpenAI Execs Mass Quit as Company Removes Control From Non-Profit Board and Hands It to Sam Altman
assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 day ago
They should be required to change their name
SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 day ago
lando55@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Please take no offense in this, I will probably not use your name suggestions, SatansMaggotyCumFart
SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
I’m deeply offended.
Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I mean killer robots from the future could solve many problems. I can elaborate, but you’re going to have to think 4th dimensionally.
sunbeam60@lemmy.one 18 hours ago
Could solve a lot of problems for the rich, that’s for sure.
dan@upvote.au 1 day ago
It’s amusing. Meta’s AI team is more open than "Open"AI ever was - they publish so many research papers for free, and the latest versions of Llama are very capable models.
a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
That’s because Facebook is selling your data and access to advertise to you. The better AI gets across the board, the more money they make. AI isn’t the product, you are.
OpenAI makes money off selling AI to others. AI is the product, not you.
The fact facebook release more code, in this instance, isn’t a good thing. It’s a reminder how fucked we all are because they make so much off our personal data they can afford to give away literally BILLIONS of dollars in IP.
dan@upvote.au 2 hours ago
Facebook doesn’t sell your data, nor does Google. That’s a common misconception. They sell your attention. Advertisers can show ads to people based on some targeting criteria, but they never see any user data.
merari42@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s the famous “As long as your not Google, Amazon or Apple” licence.
jdeath@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
which seems like a decent license idea to me
Damage@slrpnk.net 11 hours ago
Everything should be licensed like that