Comment on Google has been blocking many tools/IP ranges that try to synchronize with YouTube

• hangonasecond@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Not the OP, and I don’t actually know, but paid streaming services differ from YouTube in that everyone who accesses the content is paying for the service. On one hand, you can validate that everytime a video is served, it’s served to a paying user. On the other, you are receiving revenue directly from consumers to fund the infrastructure to store and serve the videos.

  YouTube, on the other hand, stores significantly more content, for free, and can be accessed for free, without being signed in.

  source

  • nafzib@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The “without being signed in” part of YouTube is now no longer completely true. I tried to watch a video tutorial at work the other day and it wouldn’t play because I wasn’t signed in and so “they couldn’t be sure I wasn’t a bot”. I’m not signing into any personal stuff on my work computer, or wasting time creating a “work” Google account, so I guess YT can no longer be a place where I can get helpful programming info.

    source

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That might have been because of your IT team. You can absolutely watch YouTube videos without being signed in. I do it all the time.

      source

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        YT likely recognized the IP as belonging to a commercial entity and threw up the block, due to bot concerns, over that .

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    You are spot on. The CDN simply has authentication functionality. (Or the app generates a temporary CDN URL that you’ll use)

    source
• dsilverz@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I guess they have no decentralized CDNs as YouTube does, but… paid streaming services still have their weaknesses (there certainly are tools that fetches content from there because of, e.g: entire Netflix movies/series became torrents without screen recording).

  source
• towerful@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The financial insensitive to ensure only paying users can access the content offsets the cost of the different infrastructure.

  YouTube needs to make money as cheaply as possible. They can’t afford the processing to guarantee ad delivery and secure content like that.

  If the infrastructure/delivery cost of securing content goes up, streaming services can raise their prices.
  YT can’t really serve more ads. The platform is already pretty packed with ads

  source

  • jj4211@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    YT can’t really serve more ads

    They say to hold their beer and watch this…

    source