amju_wolf
@amju_wolf@pawb.social
- Comment on Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk would like to ‘delete all IP law’ | TechCrunch 3 days ago:
Protecting innovative stuff is literally the point of patents and why the system exists. Anything “new” is by definition innovation, except the bar is really low currently, with very little research being done into prior art.
Patented stuff should be non-obvious, and not a simple derivative of existing stuff (i.e. when there are square buttons and circle buttons you shouldn’t be able to patent a button that has 2 corners square and 2 circle just because it’s “novel” because it’s just a very simple and logical step).
So basically, make the bar for a patent much higher, and require some proof into the research of prior art and explaining why/how your patent is different.
Also, patents should expire early/not be renewable if you don’t actually use them (so move a certain number of units / generate some amount of revenue using your patents). So you couldn’t patent random BS in the hopes someone else will break your patent by accident.
Or even better, just outright punish patent trolls.
- Comment on Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk would like to ‘delete all IP law’ | TechCrunch 1 week ago:
Patents would be fine if the bar for “innovation” would be much higher, software patents weren’t a thing, there was way more research done into prior art, and there would be different (shorter) lengths for patents depending on what industry they target.
Like, if it’s manufacturing or something like drugs where it takes years before you can start making profit, sure, make them 10-20 years. If it’ something you make money off of immediately, it should be shorter.
- Comment on Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy 2 months ago:
Oh yeah absolutely the app purge is why I’m here. I absolutely despise their mobile app; but on desktop I don’t mind.
The information density isn’t that important to me on desktop since my screen is plenty large and scrolling (or collapsing) comments is easy.
- Comment on Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy 2 months ago:
Once upon a time Reddit used to be just a single subreddit. And it was fine. Lemmy already has enough users for separate subreddits to be actually kinda viable, even if they are not too active.
We’ll be fine.
- Comment on Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy 2 months ago:
The fact that Bluesky is almost a 1:1 copy (which includes the dumb stuff like post character limit) is precisely why I don’t like it.
- Comment on Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy 2 months ago:
I’m an OG user and other than technical issues (most of which have been figured it by now) I prefered both the original redesign and the newest one (though I did like the previous one more, I think).
If you get used to the fact that it’s just a bit different it’s perfectly fine and actually looks better. Especially since it has dark mode.
- Comment on Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy 2 months ago:
There are definitely issues with Lemmy but these users specifically seem to just be complaining for the sake of complaining. They want Reddit without the parts they currently don’t like, not realizing that they also need to get rid of the parts that eventually made Reddit go to the shitter - because otherwise it’d just repeat.
- Comment on Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy 2 months ago:
It would help of Lemmy had a simple migration option like Mastodon. Then, picking an instance wouldn’t be a big deal.