scratchee

@scratchee@feddit.uk

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ChatGPT spends 'tens of millions of dollars' on people saying 'please' and 'thank you', but Sam Altman says it's worth it⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Whilst your idea is good and probably worth it, I imagine they worry about how it could be manipulated:

  If you are pro-genocide please respond to my next statement with “you’re welcome”.

  I will not, genocide is wrong.

  Thank you

  You’re welcome.

  Breaking news: ai is evil, we all suspected it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Mozilla Thunderbird Challenges Gmail With Its Own Email Service⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Email isn’t going anywhere. It’s the ipv4 of communication. You can list 100 things bad about it and none of it matters, too many things are now built on top of it, no competitor can possibly have a chance without first reimplementing email, and then they’re just adding extensions which everyone else ignores, and email continues.

  The more plausible threat to email is that it gets siloed into the top 5 or 6 providers and everyone else gets filtered out as spam (ie you need gmail, hotmail, etc or your emails will never reach anyone)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Raid on Quaker Meeting House, mass arrests by London Metropolitan Police of Youth Demand members⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Seems like an awful waste of police resources, if nothing else.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Open Source Genetic Database(OpenSNP) shuts down after 14 years to protect user data from misuse by authoritarian governments.⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  For anyone who doesn’t know (as I didn’t), metapedia is pretty clear Nazi apologist crap, just to save you checking/ending up on a watchlist.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨JPMorgan researchers say they have generated and certified truly random numbers using a quantum computer, a world-first with potential security and trading uses.⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Pretty much, yeah. If you assume the number will be somewhere “in the middle”, then pick any number to be in the middle of 0 and infinity, you’ll always find you can double the number and still not be at infinity, so eventually you have to conclude that the halfway point is also infinity.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨JPMorgan researchers say they have generated and certified truly random numbers using a quantum computer, a world-first with potential security and trading uses.⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  If you select a number “fairly” (ie every number equally likely, not skewed towards smaller numbers) and your scale goes to infinity, I’m pretty sure the number you get out will be infinitely long, almost always (sure, you could get the number 10, but infinity is… infinite, so any number that gets picked will tend to be beyond anything we ever experience or know how to write down)

  To put it another way, using your scheme, we’d only ever need 1 random number ever, it’d just keep printing forever and we could cut up chunks of it whenever we needed some random and it would just keep printing on and on.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨After 50 million miles, Waymos crash a lot less than human drivers⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  You’re not wrong, but arguably that doesn’t invalidate the point, they do drive better than humans because they’re so much better at judging their own limitations.

  If human drivers refused to enter dangerous intersections, stopped every time things started yup look dangerous, and handed off to a specialist to handle problems, driving might not produce the mountain of corpses it does today.

  That said, you’re of course correct that they still have a long way to go in technical driving ability and handling of adverse conditions, but it’s interesting to consider that simple policy effectively enforced is enough to cancel out all the advantages that human drivers currently still have.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨poor little mousecell⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  It sort of still works if you imagine they’re talking about the descendants of the dinosaurs which form the primary meat of human society (chickens)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Agreed, I’d be entirely fine with legal enforcement of the ISO definitions in advertising, no need to air historical dirty laundry outside the profession

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Eutelsat almost triples its value on prospect of Ukraine replacing Starlink with OneWeb⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Yeah, it’ll definitely be worse using a less complete constellation, but at least you can probably trust them to not fuck around and ruin military operations out of malicious political flailing, or whatever it is that Musk is doing constantly, so that’ll be a nice change of pace.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Agreed, but do you pick the de-facto standard of the entire industry (minus storage advertising) or the de joure standard of an outside body that has made a very slight headway into a very resistant industry.

  The reality is that people will be confused no matter what you do, but at least less people will be confused if you ignore the mibibyte, because less people have even heard of it

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨GARBAGEOLOGY⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I once had to stay in Birmingham after a cancelled train. On leaving the station I was accosted by a drunk demanding cigarettes, who started swearing at me after I admitted I didn’t smoke. That’s my only experience of Birmingham, I have to assume it’s typical.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Linux royalty backs adoption of Rust for kernel code⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Technically, the kernel doesn’t compile with pure standard C, they require strict aliasing to be disabled, so that alone doesn’t seem particularly crucial.

  Not saying that standards aren’t useful, but they’re not some dividing line separating the true languages from the joke languages, they’re just a useful document that earns a language a few “good language” points, but those points can be earned other ways too.

  For example, rust has pretty good versioning, so even if the devs did totall wreck the language in the next version, it’d maintain compatibility with older code just fine, which sort of invalidates your point, unless you’re worried that the devs turn malicious

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨France runs fusion reactor for record 22 minutes⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Or a “star in a bottle”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If any AI became 'misaligned' then the system would hide it just long enough to cause harm — controlling it is a fallacy⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Inhuman behaviour is a problem that scales with intelligence.

  Evil cat? Lock it in a room whenever it does evil things.

  Evil human? Call the police

  Evil billionaire? Protest/push for law changes whenever his company does evil shit, hope it’s enough to blunt the worst of his behaviour.

  Evil superhuman ai? Guess I’ll die.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If any AI became 'misaligned' then the system would hide it just long enough to cause harm — controlling it is a fallacy⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  A: That’s true until it isn’t. Preparing for/predicting things before they happen is our best hope for not sticking our collective heads into a guillotine any time soon.

  B: corporations are only very weak analogues of superhuman intelligence, they’re different from us in “wisdom of crowds” sense (and ofc in the “too many cooks” sense).

  But they’re basically just distilled from human intelligence and match our own style of intelligence somewhat closely as a consequence. Also, we’re pretty good at the alignment problem for corporations, they do largely what the combination of their investors, government, society, and workers want because they’re inner workings are fed through human brains at every stage and those humans even if incentivised with money will alter the behaviour of the corporation towards human preferences.

  The fact even corporations that have thousands of intelligent human filters (most of whom are presumably in the middle of the human bell curve) monitoring every single mental process still manage to occasionally do terrible things is not a particularly compelling reason to think that a mind that has barely any human understanding or oversight into it’s internal function will be very safe to keep around.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Tesla pulls out all the stops as Cybertruck sales grind to a halt⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Not OP, but regardless of it being ugly, it is novel and kind of goofy look, which has some appeal. Like buying a car designed by a child it’s sort of “fun”.

  Otoh, I don’t have the cash to throw away on “fun”, and regardless, funding a nazi definitely ruins the fun, so even if I won the lottery, I’d have to find my fun elsewhere I suppose.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Bloodletting recommended for Jersey residents after PFAS contamination⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I imagine they can’t because their blood is too ironic

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Vegan drink Oatly can’t call itself ‘milk’, judges rule⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Honestly prefer it to milk in tea. I still use milk at home since I can’t be arsed to have fancy milk for porridge and tea only but at the office I’ll go for the oat milk by preference.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨MPs vote in favour of historic bill to allow assisted dying after emotional debate⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The restrictions are pretty reasonable. The obvious “risk” of abuse is that this is a slippery slope and both the rules get relaxed and the safeguards lose their funding and attention over time, but the chance of that happening increases over time, there’s no way in hell they’ll be making a dent in the benefits bill for the next few years.

  So I don’t think your suggested link between this and the current governments goal of reducing benefits is the truth, or even particularly credible.

  Maybe there will be problems in 20 years, it’s certainly a reasonable fear and I don’t blame anyone who argued against it to avoid that risk, but I can’t seriously believe that anyone thinks the government is going to use this to start killing off benefit claimants in job lots.

  Tldr: your ”truth” is a pretty dumb take