Narrator: they can’t
Turmoil at OpenAI shows we must address whether AI developers can regulate themselves
Submitted 1 year ago by King@r.nf to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 year ago
snooggums@kbin.social 1 year ago
...and they shouldn't even if they could.
db2@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Expand that to any of the toddler-brained tech bros and you’ve got a plan started.
Sheeple@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Hey shill here. I also shill for other artistic tools like cameras and CGI. Got a lot of hate back when CGI and digital painting were still controversial. Don’t know if such “art” will ever truly be accepted by the art police, i guess AI art tools will join them.
Personally I think independent artists can accomplish much more with tools like these than they could just pretending to be a Disney art director with all the pretend Disney interns not actually helping their vision come to life.
I like when art isn’t monopolized by the ones with all the money. I also like when we allow open models that aren’t proprietary adobe subscriptions.
Also this thread is hilarious. OpenAI are literally asking to be regulated by more democratic external bodies. They’ve been making every effort once could expect on this front, but I guess that doesn’t matter?
It’s like when Altman went to the senate and said “regulate larger and more capable models like we will have, but don’t stifle and limit open source and smaller startups”
And everyone started bashing openAI for encouraging regulation of open source.
If I’m a brain dead tech bro, at least I have decades of familiarity with art, copywrite woes, and AI/ML. Back in school I was just called a nerd, but I guess that framing doesn’t really work these days so i need to be compared to frat bro adventure capitalists every time I have an opinion that’s not negative to new technologies.
PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Because we want a bunch of 80 year olds telling tech what to do.
db2@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
They already do that. Doesn’t make the Elons not also a problem.
bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Nobody can regulate themselves, that’s like… the whole point of regulation
GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Spoiler alert: No business regulates themselves effectively. Those that do only do it under duress of govt doing it if they don’t.
mojo@lemm.ee 1 year ago
In other words, this is more corporate propaganda trying to vilify open source LLMs because they can bypass regulations.
trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Tell me one industry that’s ever self regulated properly.
roguetrick@kbin.social 1 year ago
Regulate to keep them from wasting some venture capital money? Who cares.
ubermeisters@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Nobody can regulate themselves. There. I made a whole lot of things easier.
CharlesMangione@lemmy.world 1 year ago
An artificial intelligence designed to the task could, but
hersh@literature.cafe 1 year ago
But then it will follow hallucinated regulations.
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 year ago
My conspiracy theory is that AI is already running OpenAI, which explains all the weird erratic decisions