But Pythagoras hated triangles with irrational hypotenuses. A triangle with leg lengths of 3 and 4 units? Beautiful. A triangle with two 1 unit legs? Die
this meme goes from acute to obtuse real quick
Submitted 11 months ago by downhomechunk@midwest.social to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/10c8edb2-a553-48ad-b9c8-37dcf61e6ccf.jpeg
Comments
starman2112@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
elegantgoat1@lemmy.world 11 months ago
And not a right triangle in sight. I forget, did Pythagoras develop Pythagorean theorem or the law of sines?
MxM111@kbin.social 11 months ago
Bottom right, the 3x3, 4x4 and 5x5 checker boards forms Pythagorean Triple Triangle.
elegantgoat1@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Oh yeah! I see, you’re right.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
When it came to taking credit … he had all the angles covered
EatYouWell@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Well, he popularized it, but the Pythagoran theorem was something ancient civilizations had already figured out.
bdkmshr@monyet.cc 11 months ago
Documenter that documented their document gets the document credited to documenter
bi_tux@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“Every tryangle…”, says man holding a prisma
smeg@feddit.uk 11 months ago
That’s not a prism, it’s a tetrahedron, the most triangular of the solids!
Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Also, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 11 months ago
what about the number whose square is -1
nomecks@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Roses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
Zoop@beehaw.org 11 months ago
You’re just imagining it
affiliate@lemmy.world 11 months ago
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 11 months ago
Someone needs to hit you with a dose of reality