will now be turned into cosmetic-only optional "supporter packs" DLCs sold on Steam.
so...they're not removing all microtransactions
Submitted 1 year ago by TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world
will now be turned into cosmetic-only optional "supporter packs" DLCs sold on Steam.
so...they're not removing all microtransactions
Yeah, the headline is just awful. The Inkbound Dec notes that they’re removing all in-game microtransactions. The goal is to move away from pressuring you to spend money on microtransactions as you play, and keep them where they belong: on the store page.
The devs are doing exactly what they said. The headline is either click-bait, or a result of awful reading comprehension.
It’s just cosmetics, I don’t see the problem. They have to make money in some way or another.
Didnt we used to do that by selling the game tho?
Its not a free game. Im not necessarily hating on cosmetic microtransactions, but they are microtransactions and theyve claimed to remove all of them.
Deep Rock Galactic does this and nobody cares.
What’s wrong with any of that
I think my biggest problem is that the game is still in early access. There shouldn’t be any dlc imo.
Good to hear, I hope this studio will stay alive in this industry
The badness this game had at launch really can't be overstated, though. At launch, this was a paid early access always online mostly-singleplayer-with-coop game with a premium currency shop and a battle pass. And it was one of those games where the shop was the most fleshed out part.
They've added offline mode and are now reworking the microtransactions to Steam DLC, but I'm still very skeptical of them. That launch was so blatantly over the top bad.
I ignored all the mtx stuff, which was pretty easy, and have had a blast with co-op. I can’t think of anything else that comes close to this in terms of meaningful synergies with friends. And Shiny Shoe has proven they know how to use EA to turn out a good product with Monster Train so I wouldn’t give up on them quite yet.
It doesn’t matter if a game with microtransactions makes them easier to get or even free. If a game was designed with microtransactions in mind, the game has to be made tedious, grindy, and/or or frustrating completely on purpose to incentivize buying things.
Microtransactions in general are the reason I avoid the majority of games like the plague, if you have to purchase the title and it’s on PC. The only exceptions I accept is the one RPG series I play and the spin-off auto chess card game. They have it figured out, at least, that shoving the paid features down your throat is bad for the player.
I’ve never heard of this game before now, but I really liked Monster Train.
I checked it out and it looks like a lot of fun. With the news they’re removing monetization I picked up a copy.
I don’t think you’ll regret it. Shiny Shoe knows what they’re doing in terms of design and Inkbound is phenomenal. They’ve been making solid improvements throughout EA.
I love this game btw
DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What a sloppy and lazy article. They don’t even bother linking to the statement from the devs. Seriously, that would have taken less then 1 minute to add.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
They probably spent that 1 minute playing more Inkbound.