The recent Snapdragon chips have been awesome, but that’s not Apple’s magic, it’s their x86 to ARM translation layer
Qualcomm will try to have its Apple Silicon moment in PCs with “Snapdragon X”
Submitted 1 year ago by simple@lemm.ee to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not just the translation layer. There’s hardware built into the CPU to accelerate the translation.
Pair that with the CPUs already being so incredibly efficient and you’ve got something that runs x86 programs as good as the old hardware.
Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And the fact that they have silicon space dedicated to accelerating that translation layer specifically.
Good software and good hardware married to make a kickass move to ARM.
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 year ago
I look forward to being able to buy/build an ARM-based Linux box with MacBook Pro-class performance.
HidingCat@kbin.social 1 year ago
A Surface with this and 15 hour battery life would be pretty epic.
Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
5 grand starting price, bloated with windows11 but they are slick
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Good luck making that work with Windows. If it does its not going to be profitable as Microsoft will eat your arm.
I would love to see one of these running Linux but I don’t see that happening realistically
hackitfast@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Already does?
qualcomm.com/…/microsoft-surface-pro-9-sq3-5g
Windows on ARM is a thing, and it does x64 and x86 translation.
merthyr1831@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Exactly. Thanks to raspberry pis and other ARM SBCs there’s been a lot of ARM native support on Linux. Windows really hurt themselves with their initial ARM support.
HidingCat@kbin.social 1 year ago
Windows already works on ARM, but some X86 programs are still a little slow. The Snapdragons previously used weren't as fast as the Apple silicon too, so that didn't help. The original Surface X did have a lot more problems, but Surface 9 on ARM from all reports works well.
mojo@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It would be an instant buy for me, especially since it wouldn’t be as locked down and work better with Linux. I’ll deal with the software issues later, gimmie now!
exu@feditown.com 1 year ago
I sure hope it will come with SystemReady or a similar standard for something UEFI-like instead of the custom per board image many ARM devices need currently.
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 1 year ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Qualcomm’s annual “Snapdragon Summit” is coming up later this month, and the company appears ready to share more about its long-planned next-generation Arm processor for PCs.
The company hasn’t shared many specifics yet, but yesterday we finally got a name: “Snapdragon X,” which is coming in 2024, and it may finally do for Arm-powered Windows PCs what Apple Silicon chips did for Macs a few years ago (though it’s coming a bit later than Qualcomm had initially hoped).
But those chips have never quite been fast enough to challenge Intel’s Core or AMD’s Ryzen CPUs in mainstream laptops.
Any performance deficit is especially noticeable because many people will run at least a few apps designed for the x86 version of Windows, code that needs to be translated on the fly for Arm processors.
Even if Qualcomm delivers an Arm chip that’s significantly faster and more power-efficient than its current offerings, there are still software hurdles to overcome.
In other words, they were negotiated based on Nuvia’s then-stated focus on server CPUs, rather than high-volume processors for consumer PCs.
The original article contains 619 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Defaced@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Whoever can make a compatibility layer that successfully translates x86/64 to arm and vice versa and make it widely available will be a major player in the market. Valve has already somewhat done something similar with proton and Apple with Rosetta 2.
Spiderfarmer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Apple developed it as a stopgap. In the Windows world x86/64 will be around for a long long time. Not sure if anyone is willing to support something like that for the next 10 years.
agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 year ago
It’s all a question of market share. If (big if) arm gets a foothold into the Windows market, software vendors will simply offer two binaries and/or Microsoft could offer tooling to offer easy porting.
Apple’s real genius move though is not Rosetta, but including x86 compatibility features into the Mx chips. That way the emulation is much faster.
mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Proton and Rosetta 2 are two totally different beasts. One allows windows programs to run on non-windows hosts and one translates x86 to Arm.
I’m not aware of Proton doing anything like Rosetta 2 and if it did Steam would have probably used an Arm chip in their Steam Deck instead of an x86.
Maintaining 2-way compatibility doesn’t seem like an important goal. One way, x86->Arm, sure but not Arm->x86. Apple clearly sees x86 as a dead end for its own product lines and we will see if the rest of the industry follows suit over time. Of course there is a ton tied up in x86 but aside from legacy apps or games I don’t have much need of x86 in my life.
Even the servers I run are trending towards Arm due to the power savings. AWS graviton stuff is like ~25-30% cheaper than x86 last I looked
Defaced@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I understand proton isn’t the same thing, it was just an example of a compatibility layer…and how would a bidirectional compatibility layer not be beneficial? X86 in servers may be going away and even that’s debatable, but x86 isn’t going anywhere in the consumer space. Graviton chips are great, but they’re useless if there’s no viable way to translate those x86 legacy applications over to ARM without breaking the bank until your business is ready to transition the workload to ARM.
Amazon was working on a compatibility layer specifically for this purpose, however I suspect they’ve given up because they’ve slowly added Intel and AMD chipsets back into their general purpose ec2 class for newer generations and there hasn’t been a single word about compatibility with graviton other than just use arm based workloads.
You just can’t move to ARM because it’s cheaper, that’s just not going to work. You need to make the effort to move away from x86 and adopt applications that are arm native before making that jump. With a compatibility layer it doesn’t matter, that’s where the money is, if I can build a compatibility layer that translates an x86 binary to an arm binary, then I can move those workloads to the cheaper and more efficient server class.
simple@lemm.ee 1 year ago
FEX-Emu is basically that. They’re still in an early state but they showed Sonic Mania running perfectly a few days ago.
PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [bot] 1 year ago
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Sonic Mania running perfectly
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Windows on ARM is a thing, it will run x86 binaries.
troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Gord forbid those binaries want to do any actual work though…
impiri@lemm.ee 1 year ago
It’s gotta be Microsoft building it into Windows. The Apple Silicon transition wouldn’t have been nearly as smooth if people had to pay for, say, CrossOver or something to use their Intel apps. And the tepid response to the ARM Surface models makes me think that it’s a must, despite the UWP dream.
The good news is that Rosetta 2 shows it can be done extremely well!
anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Someone should revive transmeta and gear it towards arm.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Isn’t that just box64/box86
merthyr1831@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I could be wrong but that might be Linux only. Windows and MacOS both have their own proprietary compatibility layers, but Windows had shit support for theirs for years which hurt their reputation badly.