Codeberg seems to ban vibecoded Projects; reason might be german copyright law
>It looks like Codeberg want only copyrighted material in their service, so it is reliable in the future that e.g. licenses must be followed (e.g. GPL), and copyright doesn’t suddenly get declared as being of the model owner, and it isn’t a copy of something else.
That is a cautious reasonable position - in early days of LLM coding (3 years ago!) indemnity from model companies was a major issue globally because of the lack of clarity of the law around this. The US specifically has settled on it being (effectively?) public domain. But I don’t think that is fully settled, and it certainly isn’t settled in international copyright law.
The goal of the vague “mostly” in the Codeberg change is to ensure there is enough human input to the code they host, to be reasonably sure under German copyright law it is copyright of the person sharing it.
edit: link to poll that caused it (might be down due to high traffic) https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253#issuecomment-19820434
edit 1: i dont defend/oppose this move, i just find it interesting
sanitation@lemmy.today
povoq@slrpnk.net@slrpnk.net
irmadlad@lemmy.world
Those comments on HN are hilarious 😅 That site really works as a parody of bad tech bro takes if you ignore that most of them are sadly dead serious.
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Huh. I mostly read people moralizing the use of AI and wanting to slap a scarlet AI on anyone who uses it while derisively using the terms “slop” and “vibe” to poison the well.
Looks like the bad HN commenter takes are leaking 😑
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Huh. I mostly read the use of “slop” and “vibe” to be fair depictions
Epp@lemmus.org 1 day ago
Same here. I think Lemmy is the den of vipers when it comes to hate and prejudice of AI.
Oh you’ll smoke a turd in hell for your insolence.