Reuters is still reporting on the epstein files, so what’s wrong?
journalist? what is your purpose?
Submitted 3 weeks ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to [deleted]
Comments
Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
OP has the attention span of a mosquito at a funeral
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Only one thing at a time!
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Why find Banksy, a guy doing good? Why not do more admire Epstein?
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The purpose of a modern journalist is to maintain the rule of the oligarchy.
oneser@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
This is such a lame take. Like there are a shitload of legitimately fantastic community investigative journalists fighting to make a difference, but you’d rather shit on them too because Rupert Murdoch exists.
Gladaed@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
You know people don’t have to laser focus on that one thing but spit their attention as a society and get more done that way?
What of merit could a new Epstein related article have? They have been virtually the same for almost a decade.
theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Shouldn’t have exposed someone who doesn’t want to be exposed like this even though its basically already known.
First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
I mean, Banksy is actually a challenge, the Epstein files are just evident
Microw@piefed.zip 3 weeks ago
Not really, his name has been rumoured to be/somewhat known to be that for years now