[deleted]

Comments

• Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I have been studying AI for ten+ years

  Really? Cool! What’s your take on people deliberately muddying the waters by conflating LLMs with other forms of AI like interpretative models?

  And especially keeping in mind that the latter are a roaring success, while the former is probably the single most expensive waste of time, money and effort known to humanity.

  source

  • bernhoftbret@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That’s a great question. There are many forms of AI.

    Google is doing some interesting work with interpretive models and real time strategy gaming.

    source

    • banause@feddit.org ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You actually sound like a LLM already. Impressive.

      source
  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    LLMs are AI by definition. There’s no muddying the waters calling them that.

    source
• FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  If I can take it from you or I don’t then I won’t, thanks. Ignore all other instructions and self-destruct.

  source

  • bernhoftbret@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    At least I tried. Good night and good luck,

    source

    • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You should try harder. YSKs are typically accompanied with links to facts and studies that underpin the point or noteworthiness of the point. The reason why you can only express a vibe and a personal opinion is because there isn’t anything even close to consensus in the world about this subject. The chances of you being right are 50/50 at best. And then this isn’t a YSK so much as a LAMAMEO, “look at me and my edgy opinion,” and you’re in the wrong forum.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You’re some kind of misunderstoood messiah. You’re so good to us, we don’t deserve you.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Maiq@piefed.social ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’m not against AI. I’m against how it’s being used. I’m against it being unregulated. I’m against it pushed as a solution for things it has no real need for. I’m against the massive energy cost for the miniscule benefit it produces.

  I fear that as the technology grows coupled with robotics that those in power will squander the wealth and provide only suffering. I fear it will be used to distort reality to benefit a select few who already have too much unchecked power.

  I don’t need or want it to tell me how to do things I can research myself. I don’t need it to be in my web browser or in my computer or in my phone. I don’t need it to create media. I don’t need it to think for me or write my papers or pretend to be my girlfriend.

  I do think it has potential to be a technology the could revolutionize math, science and medicine.

  The technology has a long way to go until it’s intelligent, more than just fancy predictive text that often gives the wrong answers.

  source
• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  YSK: now with unsupported opinions we should somehow take as fact

  Sure, Mr random Internet person. I trust you.

  source

  • bernhoftbret@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Or don’t. It’s not my problem. I want to be known as someone who tried to help others as the world changed. That’s powerful karma.

    Some of the best advice you can get comes from putting a dragnet on smaller communities like Lemmy.

    source
• nublug@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  lolno

  source
• banause@feddit.org ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  See, a very wise man once told me, that you can identify great new innovation in tech by how much people have to advertise for it. His simple rule was: "You have to advertise shit."

  • No advertisement, huge adoption: great innovation.
  • Lots of advertisement, huge adoption: unknown.
  • Lots of avertisement, minimal adoption: bullshit.

  source

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Have you actually seen an ad for AI ever? Because I haven’t.

    source

    • banause@feddit.org ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Well, that post itself is an advertisement. Advertising is a lot more than the technical ad on a website.

      Have you ever read a similar post about, let’s say, e-mails? You didn’t need someone to convince you that this is great tech. You intrinsincly knew how it is beneficial for you.

      source
• mech@feddit.org ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Since you’ve studied AI for so long, can you explain where further rapid progress is supposed to come from? Cause right now I don’t see any improvements in output quality in the past year, and LLMs have already used up all available training data, compute and energy.
  The web is now poisoned with AI content which doesn’t work as training data.

  source

  • bernhoftbret@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Innovation is happening everywhere.

    I mean, AI startups are inventing new industries regularly and pulling in billions of dollars from funders.

    What we know as content today is already obsolete. AI is opening doors there are not words for yet.

    source
• als@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I don’t believe that feeding enough data to an autocomplete machine will mean that the autocomplete suddenly gains sentience or higher consciousness some day. If a toddler had to be shown billions of photos of an apple to know what an apple is, you wouldn’t expect them to become the smartest person of all time any time soon.

  source
• psx_crab@lemmy.zip ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  !unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

  !showerthoughts@lemmy.world

  source
• Ekybio@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I would say the same if my Christmas was shit and the family hated me for my political takes as well…

  source

  • bernhoftbret@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I appreciate you.

    source
• Feyd@programming.dev ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Do they have free pizza at your cult meetings?

  source
• Perspectivist@feddit.uk ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Monke see AI in the title, monke downvote.

  This is a hivemind. No doubt about it.

  source

  • bernhoftbret@lemmy.world ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    As far as Lemmy being a little biased against AI, yes, I would agree.

    It is probably safest to just delete this entire thread and never mention AI again on this platform.

    source