Comments

• frongt@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Direct link: socialwebfoundation.org/…/implementing-encrypted-…

  And as you might guess from the actual title, this is about user-to-user messages. I’m not sure how useful this is, because a thoroughly secure implementation is unlikely. A server operator could easily MITM your messages, if you don’t establish trust through a separate trusted channel.

  source

  • ozoned@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Thank you. Exhausted and posted the wrong link. Appreciate it.

    source
• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  ActivityPub is extensible, though. As part of our E2EE program, Mallory, Tom and I adapted the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) standard as an extension of ActivityPub to make the MLS over ActivityPub specification. The protocol fits the great MLS E2EE system onto the ActivityPub API and federation protocol.

  But a protocol specification is not enough; it must be implemented. That’s why we’re so happy to announce that the Sovereign Tech Fund has commissioned work with the Social Web Foundation to coordinate two new interoperable implementations of MLS over ActivityPub. This investment by the Sovereign Tech Fund will help move the Fediverse towards more privacy for social web users, no matter what server they use.

  source
• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Is E2EE end to end encryption?

  source

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Yes!

    source

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Kind of strange that they abbriviated “to” with “2”.

      Even stranger that I still got it right. Unless you’re messing with me. In which case, fair play. I’m totally clueless sometimes.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• NGC2346@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  So this will apply to shitjustworks as well?

  source

  • ozoned@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I think shitjustworks is Lemmy or Piefed. So those apps could implement encryption and then yup!

    source