[deleted]

Comments

• Dojan@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  It’s not just a writing quirk — it’s a blatant signalling of poor ethics.

  source

  • alias_qr_rainmaker@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Getting it to write your shit for you is definitely poor ethics, but using it for research is definitely not. Anyone who objects to AI being used for research is basically using the same argument used by the lady who screams at you for driving an SUV because you’re killing the planet

    source

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I don’t think anybody here objects to machine learning being used with protein folding simulations or weather prediction etc. actually beneficial use cases. Language model bullshit is what’s the subject of discussion here.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• edinbruh@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  It’s the kind of wording that “electrochemistry” and “Physical instrument” use in Disco Elysium

  source
• Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  There is no single sign something is ai.

  There are a hundred smaller signs that include both em-dashes, flattery and redundancy.

  source
• Kenny2999@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Phew! I was worried the issue with AI was something serious.

  source
• waterbird@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I have used emdash for years and it is so frustrating that this particular writing quirk has been picked up by bullshit LLMs. Leave my weird habits alone D;

  source