California just opened the floodgates for self-driving cars

Comments

• CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Yeah…Great…

  How about building public transport and not such stupid things?

  source

  • Zalack@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Self driving cars could actually be kind of a good stepping stone to better public transit while making more efficient use of existing roadways. You hit a button to request a car, it drives you to wherever, you need to go, and then gets tasked to pick up the next person. Where you used to need 10 cars for 10 people, you now need one.

    source

    • Nioxic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Thats still only a few people… compared to a bus?

      Why not just have a bus??

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Are these things in conflict somehow?

    source

    • fluxion@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yes, if there’s any chance in hell of self-driving becoming feasible at scale it will involve pre-defined routes, possibly with other sorts of monitoring systems, and new infrastructure/mandatory equipment for safe pedestrian crossing zones after the first handful of school kids inevitably plowed down thanks to the obviously-not-quite-there-yet image recognition systems.

      Likely we’d see some rollback to a more achievable goal of a city-funded fleet of robo-taxis running pre-defined routes with standardized equipment at maybe some years into start thinking “hmmm… maybe we should’ve just improved our bus/rail systems…”

      Cities are just as easily duped by guys like Elon Musk as any of these poor fuckers who died actually entrusting their lives to their shitty “autopilot” system. Especially when cities stand to profit from kickbacks very sorts. Don’t assume something like this won’t come at the cost of not investing in the obvious competing tech: public transport.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • aesthelete@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They’re already in conflict everywhere. Infrastructure for cars robs public transit infrastructure blind in nearly every budget. The only public transit category potentially benefiting from car infrastructure is buses, which are arguably the worst form of public transit to begin with, and still also require dedicated infrastructure to get any better (e.g. dedicated bus lanes).

      “Self-driving” cars obviously require car infrastructure which already steal from public transit budgets both federally and locally, but if we add government emphasis on this technology and start to develop specific infrastructure for “self-driving” cars (walled off routes, communications appliances, etc.) then they’ll start taking even more of the budget.

      And all of this for something that’s arguably much more braindead and useless and consuming of R&D dollars than the obviously more efficient, already technically possible forms of transit that could be built or expanded upon today.

      source
    • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yes

      source
  • EnderWi99in@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Because one of them costs taxpayer money and the other one is just signing legislation?

    source

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yeah because roads definitely don’t cost taxpayers a single dime. 🙄

      source
  • Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Public transport has been around for many decades. The US infrastructure and now lifestyle / culture is not built for it and there’s not a great reason to think it’s suddenly going to catch on. Self driving cars have real potential in the US to have an environmental impact as well save many thousands of lives each year. I wish you were more excited about this.

    source

    • Chetzemoka@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Well, we're not. There's a reason you don't see New York City jumping to adopt this tech, and it's because they bothered to invest in a public transit system that makes cars obsolete for a lot of people. If we got decent public transit in more cities combined with an actually functional high speed rail system in this country, you'd see cars become obsolete for a whole lot more people.

      This "lifestyle/culture" developed out of sheer necessity given the geographic size of this country and the complete failure to invest in mass transit. It can and must be changed, if we want our future to be viable at all.

      source
    • bron@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      While it is exciting, I can see both sides of the argument here. The infrastructure here in the US is built around cars so it would be much less effort to automate the existing infrastructure. On the other hand, things could be so much more efficient if we focused on trains and other public transport that excels at transporting a large amount of people. But that would take so much more effort and money to update the infrastructure.

      source
  • Chozo@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Most SDCs in use currently are for public transport.

    source
  • Uranium3006@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    well, LA is building out a lot of light rail as of late at least

    source
• heartfelthumburger@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Self driving cars are stupid. Invest in public transit instead.

  source

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

    source

    • fluxion@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Exactly, don’t divert investment in public transportation because you want your own personal AI chauffeur.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      If you’ve ever taken public transit in the US, you know no one is asking for perfect lol.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Isn’t a self driving car just a train? We should build trans and trollies instead. The tech is already there and they carry more people.

  source
• jeffw@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Good. I’m sick of the fearmonger. “OH NO, THIS ONE CAR GOT IN A CRASH!!!”

  Yeah, but humans crash too?

  source

  • Gsus4@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It hits different when you’re the one being crashed into, but if it crashes less than monkeys behind the wheel, bring it!

    source

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      What’s with the obsession with punishment?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Chozo@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    When I worked on Google's Waymo project, we only had a small handful of our cars involved in any collision on public roads. And every single one of them was from a human driver running into the SDC. I dunno if that's changed since I left, but even in the early stages, SDCs are remarkably safe compared to human drivers.

    source

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      And every single one of them was from a human driver running into the SDC

      Yea, me too. I’m such a good driver, others are crashing into me every day…

      source
    • sky@codesink.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Cruise has hit an oncoming car, smashed into the back of a Muni bus, and is constantly stopping in emergency zones making first responders lives harder.

      7 hours of debate of the community making it clear how much they don’t want this, how much the city’s leaders don’t want this, but the state doesn’t give a shit.

      They may be “safe” because they avoid difficult maneuvers and only drive like 25-30mph, but that doesn’t mean they’re practical or should be welcome in our cities.

      source
• NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  regulators are grappling with how to control this rapidly developing industry.

  Read: how to collect all these little black briefcases

  source
• Awa@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Well I know where I won’t be visiting in the near future.

  source

  • Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Florida?

    source
  • Nioxic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    East ukraine?

    source
  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Golden State Bad!

    source
  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Just carry two inflated dolls with you.

    Always.

    source
• Yepthatsme@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  EVs are a crutch for the failed auto industry. Personal vehicles made life worse over time. This is an extension of that mistake. The people defending it are myopic and lazy.

  source

  • tomthegeek@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Personal vehicles made life worse over time.

    When you guys are walking everywhere you’ll be regretting this insanity. Don’t bother responding I’m not interested in your delusions.

    source

    • DulyNoted@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Lol this is such a weird sentiment to me. You realize many of us do walk everywhere, right?

      source
  • WarMarshalEmu@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    “The people defending it are myopic and lazy.” I don’t think that’s a fair statement. If I could walk/bike everywhere I would but as it turns out my area isn’t walk-able at all. I didn’t choose the infrastructure I have.

    source
• AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  As cool as the idea of self driving cars are, I don’t trust it not to become a future where script kiddies and novice hackers take control of vehicles and crash them for fun if AI gets involved.

  Don’t even get me started on if a country had AI self driving cars and an enemy nation hacks the AI and sends directions that cause the car to end up damaging itself without you knowing. Or just uses it to cause all the vehicles in an area to crash and not be able to deploy airbags.

  source
• autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is the best summary I could come up with:

  ---

  California often serves as a “canary in the coal mine for the country and the developed world,” said David Zipper, Visiting Fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Taubman Center for State and Local Government.

  The California Public Utilities Commission approved the permits for Waymo and Cruise on Thursday despite pushback from local leaders and many residents in San Francisco, who argue that the autonomous vehicles have caused chaos around the city — from traffic jams to disrupted emergency scenes.

  But critics say this data is unreliable and incomplete because the companies are not required to report a range of other incidents that affect the public — such as when a car veers into a bike or bus lane or stops short and disrupts traffic.

  Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University professor who has conducted research on autonomous-vehicle safety for decades, said the self-driving car companies are under intense pressure to turn a profit and — in some cases — prove the business’s viability to shareholders.

  In Los Angeles, Jarvis Murray, the county’s transportation administrator, said it is “untenable” to allow a new mobility service to expand without requiring companies to report more data and also give the cities more say over what is happening on their public roadways.

  In an attempt to halt Thursday’s vote, they wrote letters and spoke at hearings to bring attention to a string of incidents in recent months: A car stopping near the scene of a mass shooting, another getting tangled in caution tape and downed wires after a major storm and another blocking a firetruck from exiting a station for several minutes.

  ---

  I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  source