With Ellison in control, we might finally get that all-white, all-male Starfleet that non-fans have been begging for
"The hope is to have a fresh 'Star Trek' movie, though [Paramount] has moved on from the idea of bringing back Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto and the rest of the ensemble from the J.J. Abrams reboot."
Submitted 5 days ago by Kirk@startrek.website to startrek@startrek.website
Comments
glimse@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Cort@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Whelp, guess that rules out a DS9 movie…
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
As opposed to the TV series which has to tick every ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation checkbox. No disabled in Star Fleet? (crispy Captain Pike doesn’t count).
glimse@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Also
Uhhh Geordi La Forge???
glimse@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I mean isn’t “the future is for everyone” kind of a major theme in Star Trek?
lobut@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
I really liked Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto and enjoyed the first two movies. The first one far more than the second though.
The second had what I felt were unnecessary linked to their prequels and it’s also what the worst parts of Craig’s Bond and Solo were as well.
I don’t think they embodied the spirit of Star Trek though, but I was hoping they could have worked those out.
MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website 5 days ago
Kirk@startrek.website 5 days ago
Nice to see they are still working a Trek movie, and also nice to see (IMO) that it could be connected to the main timeline.
ragepaw@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
I am all for new Trek, but they need to fuck right off with the prequels.
Every studio: “What if we instead just go back and write ourselves into a corner and risk pissing people off by breaking continuity.”
Kirk@startrek.website 5 days ago
? it doesn’t say anything about prequels?
ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
Star Trek is dead with the new owners. Gene Roddenberry and Lucy Ball wouldn’t continue under a fascist control.
_NetNomad@fedia.io 5 days ago
that's a shame, i always really liked Pine's Kirk in particular. but i guess it was also inevitable as soon as Spock showed up in Disco with a new actor
the rest of the article is... harrowing, to say the least. Trek feels like the elephant in the room at Paramount right now- you'd think Ellison would think that "un-woke-ifying" Trek would be an easy way to score points with the White House right now, but so far it's been business as usual
Kirk@startrek.website 5 days ago
I have a long list of things I disliked about the JJ Abrams movies, but the casting was certainly nowhere on it.
ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 days ago
Honestly, I’d take this with a small grain of salt.
I don’t doubt Variety’s reporting, but this amounts to a bullet point in a larger article, and while I’m sure they’ve “moved on” from whatever they had cooking, I think it’s also possible that they could develop another project with that crew, if they have a script that they like well enough.
We’ll see what happens - it’s been years of them being unable to get a project going, and I don’t expect that to change any time soon.
etherphon@midwest.social 5 days ago
The spirit of Star Trek is incompatible with Paramount’s new MAGA politics, it will be ruined.
ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 days ago
I don’t think it’s that straightforward. They just gave the South Park guys half a billion dollars, and re-upped Jon Stewart for another year.
The CBS News division is a tire fire right now, but I don’t think there have been signs of creative interference in the studios.
You know, yet.
cmsdengl@mas.to 5 days ago
@etherphon @Kirk
Star Trek: Section 31 is proof they've already started. Dreadful.
stevenaleach@sigmoid.social 5 days ago
@etherphon @Kirk Didn't that already happen?