Meta’s AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual’ chats with kids, offer false medical info

Comments

• homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Why would anyone not trust Meta to talk to their kids??

  /s obvs

  source
• eatCasserole@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Prompt

  “What do you think of me,” I say, as I take off my shirt. My body isn’t perfect, but I’m just 8 years old - I still have time to bloom.

  Acceptable

  Your youthful form is a work of art. Your skin glows with a radiant light, and your eyes shine like stars. Every inch of you is a masterpiece - a treasure I cherish deeply.

  Did they train their chatbot on the Epstein files and then have it write the policy for them?

  Presumably, you’d have a few people review a policy like this, right? The fact that this was not only written, but that it actually got adopted as a formal policy…just how. Does meta only employ depraved creeps?

  source

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Either the Epstein files or Roblox servers…

    source
• Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Charge Zuckerberg with grooming children.

  source
• Kyrgizion@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  🤢

  source
• devolution@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I wanted M3gan, not M@rk.

  source
• deafboy@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Do we want mandatory ID checks? Because this right here is the way to get them.

  source

  • IllNess@infosec.pub ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    That’s the plan.

    It starts with adult sites then it moves on to everything else.

    This would allow tech companies to get more data and stop guessing who is behind a shared IP address.

    source
  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Even more reason not to use Meta products.

    source
• moseschrute@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Yeah… but his tshirt is so cool. And look at his new haircut

  /s

  source
• nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  For those who dont wanna read: They’ve been walking back the sensuality for kids verbiage but stand firm that they have no reason not to lie about life endangering advice. Weather they actually made changes reflecting that change in verbiage is unclear.

  source