The AUKUS Submarine Deal is Dead. The US can’t provide the submarines. The UK can neither make up for the shortfall nor co-develop such a submarine in a reasonable timeframe

Comments

• MalReynolds@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If this is so, well, thank fuck for that. Such a bad, expensive idea. One good thing to come from Trump is a severe loss of faith in the US, long overdue.

  source
• Fleur_@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  “Heyyyyyyy”

  -Australia to France right now

  source

  • dgriffith@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    " Read 16h ago "

    • France

    source
• No1@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It would be kinda funny if we crawled back to the French, begged them to build us some subs, and then the French tell us to “Mange de la merde!”

  source

  • TimePencil@infosec.exchange ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    @No1

    The French wouldn't say that. They'd say whatever is French for "Sign here!"

    We'd then pay them a few more BILLION dollars, and the French would wait a week or two for another policy reversal.

    At the rate we're going, we'll end up buying our subs from China...

    @Davriellelouna

    source

    • Tenderizer@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      We’d probably better be able to rely on the Chinese ones during WW3 than the American ones.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • whybird@aus.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      @TimePencil @No1 @Davriellelouna … through temu

      source
• UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Ha-Ha!

  source
• Mountaineer@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  nationalsecurityjournal.org looks like a propaganda outlet.

  How do you even check the bonafides of a random site like this?

  source
• naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• nevetsg@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I am no expert but the Japanese Sub ‘looked’ really cool when it visited a few years back

  source