Wouldn’t it have made more sense for them to improve the boot recovery process instead?
If the system fails to boot after a driver update, roll back the update and inform the user on startup.
Submitted 3 weeks ago by baatliwala@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.theverge.com/news/692637/microsoft-windows-kernel-antivirus-changes
Wouldn’t it have made more sense for them to improve the boot recovery process instead?
If the system fails to boot after a driver update, roll back the update and inform the user on startup.
AFAIK the Crowdstrike issue wasn’t a driver update, just virus definitions outside the driver, so your method wouldn’t have helped.
I wonder whether solutions like Twincat for industrial PC/PLCs will be affected by this. Interfacing directly with the kernel and replacing the scheduler are, AFAIK, fundamental to making Windows viable for real time use.
An interesting question. Assuming they’re only targeting security/antivirus products at the moment (see the discussion regarding anti-cheat) it may be that those applications get a pass for now.
No I think they are limiting kernel access. These are just what moist people know that would use it.
I could see some exception for windows 11 IoT being made, but I honestly don’t know.
Here’s hoping anticheat goes with them.
shininghero@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Cool. Do anticheat vendors next.
Toes@ani.social 3 weeks ago
Do them now! Haha