Seeking for funding

Comments

• ladicius@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Whatever you add to both sides of the equation neutralises each other.

  So essentially you don’t need it.

  source

  • coherent_domain@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Only when addition have a inverse operation.

    source

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.

      source
  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Knda like AI, nobody needs it

    source
• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Even if they had a complete model of all of physics, it still wouldn’t answer all questions, as a lot of important data is just random. Whether nature decided to go with D-molecule or L-molecule is essentially random.

  source

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Even if you have an equation, doesn’t mean you can solve it. N-body problem is a perfect example.

    You cannot determine all the Parameters of the equations accurately. Changing the parameters could drastically alter the output behavior. Finally, you don’t know the initial conditions too.

    These are the challenges that classical physics have to deal with. Quantum is not even factored into, yet.

    Welcome to the land of Nonlinear Dynamics. We have bifurcations, strange attractors and of course, whole lotta chaos.

    source
  • fullsquare@awful.systems ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    iirc L-aminoacids and D-sugars, that is these observed in nature, are very slightly more stable than the opposite because of weak interaction

    probably it’s just down to a specific piece of quartz or soot that got lucky and chiral amplification gets you from there

    also it’s not physics, or more precisely it’s a very physicy subbranch of chemistry, and it’s done by chemists because physicists suck at doing chemistry for some reason (i’ve seen it firsthand)

    source
  • REDACTED@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    i.imgur.com/w9w0Acb.jpeg

    source
• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  seeking for

  1. Looking for
  2. Seeking

  You can choose only one lane.

  source

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Looking to seek-for

    source
  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    multi track drifting

    source
• fullsquare@awful.systems ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  is the evil funding man going to eat the gimp pepper

  source
• loomy@lemy.lol ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I don’t want to upvote this ; but I will.

  source