There’s an idea among rulers of the past that their control was necessary and even better for the population than something closer to democracy.
It goes hand-in-hand with using religion as a tool to keep people ignorant and discourage them from learning about the world.
Now that it’s pretty clear which side won and we’re living in the aftermath, do you think it’s an improvement?
Part of me believes that we’re progressing way faster than we’re evolving and nobody is able to keep up with how fast things are changing around them. It seems like the forbidden fruit of knowledge is giving us problems instead of only solving them.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Assuming you’re not homeless right now and located in most of the western world, consider the absolute luxury you have of having a solid roof over your head right now, a climate controlled room to your preferred temperature, some amount of long life shelf stable food in your kitchen, light, an infinite amount of clean drinking water on tap 24/7, a bed not made of agricultural products that were still growing outside in the last 3 months, the ability to read and write from a young age, vaccines against diseases that used to wipe out entire families, and healthcare (while expensive) can save your life from extremely critical injuries and maladies.
The most powerful kings of ages prior would trade everything to have what you have right now.
PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
One of my favorite stories is of Charlemagne, first Holy Roman Emperor, seeking to revive learning and education at his court (and, by extension, reviving elite learning in effectively all of continental Western Europe).
Thus, one of the most powerful men in the world at the time, learned to write, and only imperfectly even with repeated and dedicated practice, in his fucking 40s or 50s.
We are immensely blessed to live in the modern day, even with all of its very serious and real curses.