I am okay with this only in cases where 1) the author approves, and 2) there is no audible version anyways.
Some people prefer listening to their books instead of reading and that’s totally ok. Indie authors can’t always afford to hire a narrator but I’d still want the buyers to be able to listen to the book.
Big question is, will the author get paid for the download or not…
Godnroc@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Fucking gross. Maybe it’s the 250+ audiobooks I have influencing me, but the very best ones I’ve listened to transcend just turning words into sound. Sound effects, music, tone, emotion, accents, sarcasm, and god damn BLOOPERS all improve the experience beyond just hearing what is written down.
I’m against it, fuck that literal noise.
taladar@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Actually hard disagreeing on that. I absolutely hate the audio drama versions of audio books and prefer the narrator only ones since they are much clearer and require a lot less focus to listen to and work in more contexts (background noise,…). Sound effects and music (while something is read, intro or outro style music is okay) distract from the actual content.
echodot@feddit.uk 11 months ago
Usually I agree with this with the exception of hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy where the audio drama is much better than the audiobook version.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 11 months ago
All I can think of is Jim Dale’s reading of the Harry Potter books. Fucking epic.
echodot@feddit.uk 11 months ago
What, no way, they did not replace Steven Fry.
Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Also Andy Serkis reading the lord of the rings. 11/10