“Must” in a headline means “won’t.”
Tech giants must protect reporter-source privacy in leak cases.
Submitted 1 year ago by Tea@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.world
https://freedom.press/issues/tech-giants-must-protect-reporter-source-privacy-in-leak-cases/
Comments
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 year ago
dohpaz42@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I shouldn’t be surprised there is an act allowing Big Brother to surreptitiously request data on reporters. Dubs and Dick really stuck it to us over with the Patriot Act and everything that followed.
I don’t see why this doesn’t constitute a constitutional crisis. This is exactly why there is a first amendment.
iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Yeah… we’ve been well past the point of constitutional crises that never get addressed or even an eye batted toward them for decades lol.
Press freedom has been fucked for so long.
One of the few things I agree with Thomas Jefferson concerning the actual functioning of the US government is that the Constitution should be revisited and updated more often. It would definitely encourage greater awareness of the document and keep many from both (1) having it used as a dogmatic/pseudoreligious excuse to fit into whatever narrative the oligarchs hope to push and (2) failing to enshrine fundamental liberties in a national codex.
As it is, we’re way too far gone for that shit and I think a complete restructuring is in order, which I don’t think will happen in our current union. Gonna take some major change and pain to get there.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 year ago
the Constitution should be revisited and updated more often
Trump would love that…
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Unless it’s a leak within Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, or X of course.
America demands retribution.
sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Since nobody looks things up anymore:
RFC 2119: