Meh. At least it’s green space and not a strip mall or a parking lot.
U.S. leads countries where golf courses occupy more land than solar, wind plants
Submitted 5 days ago by compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to energy@slrpnk.net
Comments
reddig33@lemmy.world 5 days ago
compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 5 days ago
Grass may be green, but I wouldn’t call a golf course a ‘green space’. Between the amount of pesticide and fertilizer they use, and the fact that it’s a monoculture, a golf course is pretty much an ecological dead zone.
lordnikon@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Plus the amount of water to keep nonative English grass on American soil green makes it even woese than a strip mall
Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 days ago
it’s a private greenspace of minimal social, communal, or economic value. it’s a high maintenance monoculture play ground for theevery wealthy
alykanas@slrpnk.net 4 days ago
unseen benefits of golf : keeps a lot of pricks busy and out of the way at weekends.
think carefully before returning golfers to the general population.
Beastimus@slrpnk.net 5 days ago
This has already been posted here I think
cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
The United States tops the list, with more than 16,000 golf courses, followed by the United Kingdom (around 3,100) and Japan (around 2,700). Canada, Australia, Germany, South Korea, France, China and Sweden round out the top 10 countries.
shalafi@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Now compare that with livable surface area.
houseofleft@slrpnk.net 4 days ago
How meaningful is the golf vs renewables comparison? Wind and solar require different ammounts of land, especially factoring in offshore wind? Also, Sweden has one of the cleanest energy make ups, but a comparitively high amount of golf courses, so like, I dunno?
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Ok, now I need to see the graph that compates countries’ golf courses vs solar fields as % of area.