LOL, their demo shows Cyberpunk running at a mere 27fps on the 5090 with DLSS off. Is that supposed to sell me on this product?
Nvidia Announces RTX 50's Graphic Card Blackwell Series: RTX 5090 ($1999), RTX 5080 ($999), RTX 5070 Ti ($749), RTX 5070 ($549)
Submitted 5 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to games@lemmy.world
https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/6/24337396/nvidia-rtx-5080-5090-5070-ti-5070-price-release-date
Comments
Zarxrax@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 5 months ago
The 4090 gets like sub 20fps without DLSS and stuff. Seems like a good improvement.
KamikazeRusher@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Maybe I’m stuck in the last decade, but these prices seem insane. I know we’ve yet to see what a 5050 (lol) or 5060 would be capable of or its price point. However launching at $549 as your lowest card feels like a significant amount of the consumer base won’t be able to buy any of these.
simple@lemm.ee 5 months ago
They’ll sell out anyways due to lack of good competition. Intel is getting there but still have driver issues, AMD didn’t announce their GPU prices yet but their entire strategy is following Nvidia and lowering the price by 10% or something.
Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Sadly I think this is the new normal. You could buy a decent GPU, or you could buy an entire game console. Unless you have some other reason to need a strong PC, it just doesn’t seem worth the investment.
At least Intel are trying to keep their prices low.
GoodEye8@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Actually AMD has said they’re ditching their high end options and will also focus on budget and midrange cards. AMD has also promised better raytracing performance (compared to their older cards) so I don’t think it will be the new norm if AMD also prices their cards competitively to Intel. The high end cards will be overpriced as it seems like the target audience doesn’t care that they’re paying shitton of money. But budget and midrange options might slip away from Nvidia and get cheaper, especially if the upscaler crutch breaks and devs have to start doing actual optimizations for their games.
deur@feddit.nl 5 months ago
Okay losers, time for you to spend obscene amounts to do your part in funding the terrible shit company nvidia.
makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 5 months ago
I’m waiting for that new Intel gear.
caut_R@lemmy.world 5 months ago
My last new graphics card was a 1080, I‘ve bought second hand since then and will keep doing that cause these prices are…
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 months ago
This is absolutely 3dfx level of screwing over consumers and all about just faking frames to get their “performance”.
TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
The performance improvements claims are a bit shady as they compare the old FG technique which only creates one frame for every legit frame, with the next gen FG which can generate up to 3.
All Nvidia performance plots I’ve seen mention this at the bottom, making comparison very favorable to the 5000 series GPU supposedly.
Tetsuo@jlai.lu 5 months ago
Thanks for the heads up.
I really don’t like that new Frame interpolation tech and think it’s almost only useful to marketers but not for actual gaming.
At least I wouldn’t touch it with any competitive game.
Hopefully we will get third party benchmarks soon without the bullshit perfs from Nvidia.
Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 5 months ago
On the side with the performance graphs, Farcry and Plague Tale should be more representative, if you want to ignore FG. That’s still only two games, with first-party benchmarks, so wait for third-party anyway.