Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

NASA landed on the moon, by shooting for the moon

⁨75⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨iii@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨showerthoughts@lemmy.world⁩

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You actually have to shoot for where the moon will be

    source
    • superkret@feddit.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Actually you shoot horizontally along Earth’s equator, to increase your orbital speed until your apoapsis intersects the lunar sphere of gravitational influence.

      source
      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Well yeah, but I was trying to stick to the wording of the shower thought. We’ve all played Kerbal Space Program

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Wogi@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I mean you only have to shoot to where it will be half way, moon will take care of the rest

      source
  • wjrii@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And if they’d done the math wrong, they’d have landed among the stars.

    source
    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Actually, they DID do the math wrong once…landed in the Ocean on earth. They just had to say “Ok…lets go back home.”

      Tom Hanks was in a movie about it that got a LOT of facts wrong.

      source
      • ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Land in ocean, suddenly Tom Hanks is involved.

        See? They still landed amongst the stars.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • joyjoy@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Not if you make a free return trajectory.

      source
    • Thorry84@feddit.nl ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s not how orbital mechanics work

      source
      • ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You’re not how orbital mechanics work.

        source
      • wjrii@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Hush!

        source
    • iii@mander.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Works in general too: do the maths wrong, then the solution is wrong, too.

      source