Another day, more Mozilla FUD. I just saw the switched on Linux guy posted some too. They arent a perfect company, but lets not pretend they’re exactly like google or a mini google. It feels almost coordinated to get you to feel like all companies are compromised, so you should just use the popular thing and forget about privacy and security.
The Mozilla Graveyard
Submitted 7 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.spacebar.news/the-mozilla-graveyard/
Comments
burgeoning@lemmy.world 7 months ago
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 7 months ago
It is not really FUD to point out that Mozilla wastes ungodly amounts of money on projects of dubious utility instead of investing into their browser. Their current trajectory doesn’t inspire much confidence either. Mozilla started to waste even more money on ‘AI’ features nobody asked for.
barsoap@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Mozilla doesn’t exist to fund Firefox. Firefox exists to fund Mozilla. It’s been that since the very fucking beginning: Mozilla is a general internet charity that makes money with a browser. It’s always been that way. It never has been any different. I may have to repeat myself: The purpose of Mozilla isn’t to fund Firefox the purpose of Firefox is to be a money-maker for Mozilla’s charitable causes.
Mbourgon@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Actually, their new AI thing is actually useful: stays on-device, and summarizes web pages and videos.
But yes, they could stand to spend more money on the browser, and less on their CEO and other non-browser things.
cm0002@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Enshittification isn’t an overnight thing, red flags are building and it’s important to call it out.
corbin@infosec.pub 7 months ago
The Mozilla FUD where I said I like Firefox and pointed out how many of the projects continued in some form after Mozilla ended them?
cley_faye@lemmy.world 7 months ago
You’re right, they aren’t google. Not for lack of trying though.
You see posts putting some shade over Mozilla, and your immediate reaction is “it feels almost coordinated”. Well, that may be. But it would be hard to distinguish a “coordinated attack” from a “that’s just the things they’re doing, and there’s report on it” article, no? Especially when most of it can be fact-checked.
In this particular case, those abandoned projects got picked up by other… sometimes. And sometimes not. But they were abandoned. There’s no denying that.
If you want some more hot water for Mozilla, since you’re talking about privacy and security, you’d be interested in their recent switch regarding these points. Sure, the PR is all about protecting privacy and users, but looking into the acts, the message is a bit more diluted. And there’s always a fair amount of people that are ready to do the opposite of what you claims; namely discarding all criticism because “Mozilla”, when the same criticism are totally fair play when talking about other big companies.
Being keen on maintaining user privacy, system security, and trust, is not the same as picking a “champion” and sticking to it until the end. Mozilla have been doing shady things for half a decade now, and they should not get a free pass because they’re still the lesser evil for now.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Honestly a number of these were abandoned for reasons that are fair enough
TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Seeing “the source is available here on GitHub”, “the project was forked and is now maintained as (other name)”, etc. after most of these really helps show the difference with Google. Well that and the length of the article, Google has far more deaths under their belt.
dinckelman@lemmy.world 7 months ago
The loss of FirefoxOS was quite a shame at the time, but i can’t say i miss the rest. Servo, on the other hand, is all but dead. Cannot wait to see what the future holds for the project
ravhall@discuss.online 7 months ago
I think Firefox OS could have a successful reboot today. JavaScript frameworks were not what they are now, and between react, vue, svelte, and angular, I think we are in a good place.
I feel electron and tauri have demonstrated how well JavaScript can be used for interface while allowing it to access system resources in a safe way.
Perhaps it should not be run by Mozilla, though, IMO they should focus on Firefox.
lime@feddit.nu 7 months ago
barsoap@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Servo isn’t dead it’s just on slow burn. Also, under the umbrella of the Linux Foundation Europe. As far as Mozilla is concerned it has served its purpose: Prototype stuff that then got included in Firefox to get rid of a quite large amount of technical debt.
The long and short of it is: Firefox is supposed to make money for Mozilla’s charitable causes. It’s not an end in itself, but a means to an end.
jimmy90@lemmy.world 7 months ago
so you missed the huge amount of effort going into Servo recently?
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 7 months ago
A forgotten one is webassembly.studio, an in-browser IDE for creating WASM projects with way less pain than other methods. It got discontinued the year I needed it for my school project. It was open source but I failed to rehost it myself and public mirrors only appeared after I spent days trying to make Emscripten work, tore my hair out over WebGL and then finally painfully built the whole thing with CSS (and a bit of JS; yes, it was indeed a disaster).
jacksilver@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Do you still use WASM? I’ve been exploring the space and wasn’t sure what the best tools are for developing in that space.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 7 months ago
Nope. But I guess a mirror of WebAssembly Studio would still be the best starting point despite its slow developmemt lately.
Jeffool@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I wonder if Mozilla would’ve benefitted if something like Hello was still around when the pandemic hit. Hello was a Firefox feature that made video chatting easy. You just needed to click the link.
lnxtx@feddit.nl 7 months ago
At least they tried.
kolorafa@lemmy.world 7 months ago
You mean they throw a lot of money at the wall hoping that something will stick?
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 months ago
That’s how it works, yes.
You spend money creating something, hoping the market will pick it up.
agelord@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Imagine my disappointment when I realized “Firefox advance” wasn’t for the Gameboy advance :(
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
Twenty things Mozilla the company killed and they didn’t mention ITS OWN NAMESAKE APP. It’s didn’t ‘evolve’ into Firefox: they split the baby in half and cut away the connective tissue.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Seamonkey is still kinda alive.
dantheclamman@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I used the Notes quite a bit and thought it was a mistake to get rid of it. People pay for notes and tasks related sync services, so it could have been a revenue source. I also miss Firefox Panorama
yamanii@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I felt the firefox send death, used all the time to share quick files with friends, thankfully I discovered litterbox after they killed it.
crewman_princess@lemmy.sdf.org 7 months ago
There’s also send.vis.ee
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 months ago
Panasonic created their own version of firefox tv to use for their tvs
RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Those a rookie numbers!
–A single Google product manager, probably
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 7 months ago
People talk about dead Google products, but a lot of them have just been superceded by other products.
steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
Besides the 13 messaging platforms I’d say most of them haven’t.