Sadly, wind power scales up MASSIVELY with blade size and height. The inverse makes it mostly non-viable for most homes.
They need consistent, strong winds to function well. Power output scales with a cube of the windspeed (2x wind speed = 8x output) and the square of the blade length (2x length = 4x output) This means they need to be considerably above everything that slows the wind down. Once you’re 50m+ above the tallest trees, you might as well just scale up the blades and go grid scale, you’ve done the hard bit.
Oh, and from the article, it’s 200W average, in perfect conditions. Conditions that almost no one can meet.
BevsDad@lemmy.ca
Dequei@piefed.social
Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
I’m guessing about 1kW
cynar@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
The article claims 200W average. The 1kW is to deal with gusts.
That’s also assuming perfect mounting conditions.
credo@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Well, how much if I mount it? I have some experience hanging pictures.
klankin@piefed.ca 8 hours ago
200Wh average per month, or 0.27Wh.
Is my math wrong or is that absolute garbage? A desktop solar panel could compete
bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
Per hour
remotelove@lemmy.ca 19 hours ago
Divided by not wind.
davidagain@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Do you mean kwh/h?