Didn’t they change the law so you can’t track private flights anymore? Or was Melon Husk just trying to get that done? Or was that just me imagining things again? 🤔
It’s also not something that you can really stop people from doing.
You might be able to stop people sharing the information freely, but, the transponders that people track and the protocols and standards for the communication are well known internationally. It doesn’t take more than $50 in parts to set up your own receiver and connect it to a computer.
I’d consider any law prohibiting the observation of air traffic by the public to be impossible to enforce. How can you stop someone from listening by law?
Sharing the information, however, that’s a bit different.
The FAA reauthorization act slipped in that ownership of private jets could remain anonymous. So you can still track them, because all flight plans are public and need to be for safety reasons, but they no longer have to tell you who owns what tail number. A dedicated tracker can figure out what plane belongs to who, either by showing up at the airport, or by comparing flight logs with other information about celebrity locations.
So you can still track them, because all flight plans are public and need to be for safety reasons, but they no longer have to tell you who owns what tail number.
I feel like that has a little bit to do with how journalists tracked down a bunch of FBI she’ll companies that operated spy planes over BLM(and other) protests.
SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Didn’t they change the law so you can’t track private flights anymore? Or was Melon Husk just trying to get that done? Or was that just me imagining things again? 🤔
spookedintownsville@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
As far as I know, you can still track Elon’s flights. It’s not illegal since it was all publicly available information to begin with.
MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
It’s also not something that you can really stop people from doing.
You might be able to stop people sharing the information freely, but, the transponders that people track and the protocols and standards for the communication are well known internationally. It doesn’t take more than $50 in parts to set up your own receiver and connect it to a computer.
I’d consider any law prohibiting the observation of air traffic by the public to be impossible to enforce. How can you stop someone from listening by law?
Sharing the information, however, that’s a bit different.
mvirts@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
They can’t prevent tracking because aircraft are required to broadcast their information when in flight.
Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
The FAA reauthorization act slipped in that ownership of private jets could remain anonymous. So you can still track them, because all flight plans are public and need to be for safety reasons, but they no longer have to tell you who owns what tail number. A dedicated tracker can figure out what plane belongs to who, either by showing up at the airport, or by comparing flight logs with other information about celebrity locations.
aidan@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I feel like that has a little bit to do with how journalists tracked down a bunch of FBI she’ll companies that operated spy planes over BLM(and other) protests.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
Why use spy planes? Why not just use police helicopters? Police helicopters are a normal sight above any large scale demonstration