Comment on Rayfish is working on my phone!
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 hours agoNeither has a wireguard tunnel into your home network, you host the WG server on your own computer (or router even, that’s what I do) and just point your clients to that using either static IP if you have it or a DDNS service like the cloudflare you’re using if you have a dynamic IP.
altphoto@lemmy.today 18 hours ago
WireGuard still needs a central server that you don’t control.
Anyway, this thing is just impressive that’s all.
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 hours ago
No, it really doesn’t
goldman60@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
This is flatly incorrect
Lolwhat, no it doesn’t…? Did an AI tell you that?
You spin up a Wireguard server yourself (or use the one in many routers), point clients to that and be happy. The only “other” server in that chain might be a (Dyn)DNS resolver, and you could even self-host that one (and therefore also omit Cloudflare).
altphoto@lemmy.today 17 hours ago
Oh so it doesn’t do dynamic changes in IP like rayfish does within a few seconds?
That’s the resolver’s job, Wireguard absolutely reconnects asap if the connection’s heartbeat goes out. You in your case got Cloudflare to make sure it can connect somewhere.
The only way to truely serverless’ly find each other when both parties got dynamic IPs would be IPv6 multicast (such as via Librecast). Not just is that still not supported by the network itself a lot of times (sadly) but I doubt any LLM on this planet would implement it correctly, way too niche. Any other way leads through some DNS resolver or third-party service (like Cloudflare) or a network such as Magic Wormhole.
It’s fine if the Slopware works for you, but your arguments make no sense whatsoever. The only thing you’re currently doing is making enemies in the selfhosting community, not connections.
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 hours ago
That’s not ratfish handling that but the cloudflare DDNS you’re using that handles that. So yes, self hosted WG server handles that just as fast.